In the wake of substantial losses suffered by derivatives dealers and end users in recent years, questions are being raised about the type of regulatory structure needed to monitor and control the use of derivatives. Financial institutions believe that the issue can be resolved by tighter internal controls, whereas regulators believe there is a need for more direct oversight. The conventional view is that derivatives are highly useful instruments which simply need to be handled with care. In this paper, it is argued that this belief is misplaced and, although useful for hedging, derivatives are a high risk technology which pose inherent difficulties for regulation and control. As suggested by Perrow, where the environment of such technologies is both complex and tightly coupled, such that any significant failure cannot be contained, the potential for catastrophe is significant. The foregoing analysis shows that derivatives operate in a complex and tightly coupled environment, posing a significant threat to the financial system. Regulatory reform would require much greater cooperation between regulators and a proactive approach to regulation rather than a reactive one.
Article navigation
1 January 1996
Review Article|
January 01 1996
REGULATING DERIVATIVES: OPERATOR ERROR OR SYSTEM FAILURE? Available to Purchase
ATUL K. SHAH
ATUL K. SHAH
LECTURER, UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL AND VISITING ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1740-0279
Print ISSN: 1358-1988
© MCB UP Limited
1996
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (1996) 4 (1): 17–35.
Citation
SHAH AK (1996), "REGULATING DERIVATIVES: OPERATOR ERROR OR SYSTEM FAILURE?". Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 4 No. 1 pp. 17–35, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024864
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Reframing the Itaewon crowd crush: a systems analysis using Perrow’s framework
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (May,2025)
A mathematical model for exploring the evolution of organizational structure
International Journal of Organizational Analysis (March,2015)
Analysing systemic risk in banking and financial markets
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (January,1997)
Is the Normal Accidents perspective falsifiable?
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (February,2013)
Historical failures and epistemic accidents: NASA’s Challenger disaster and the organizational risks of Generative AI
Journal of Management History (April,2026)
Related Chapters
The comparative analysis of organizational forms: Considering field and ecological approaches
Studying Differences between Organizations: Comparative Approaches to Organizational Research
Teachers’ Work and Instructional Management, Part I: Alternative Views of the Task of Teaching
Theory And Research In Educational Administration
Loss aversion asset pricing model performance: empirical evidence from five pacific-basin countries
Asia Pacific Financial Markets in Comparative Perspective: Issues and Implications for the 21st Century
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
