| Chapter 2 | ||
| Fig. 1. | EU CSR Developments and Participation Levels: A Conceptual Trend. | 30 |
| Chapter 3 | ||
| Fig. 1. | Cube-shaped of Corporate Social Responsibility in CGC. | 41 |
| Fig. 2. | Implicit versus Explicit Approach. | 43 |
| Fig. 3. | Positioning of Countries in the Cube-shaped of Corporate Social Responsibility in CGC. | 52 |
| Chapter 5 | ||
| Fig. 1. | Depiction of Change in Ranks for Neutral Governments; Periods 2014–2015, 2015–2016, 2014–2016. | 93 |
| Fig. 2. | Depiction of Change in Ranks for Active Governments; Periods 2014–2015, 2015–16, 2014–2016. | 94 |
| Chapter 7 | ||
| Fig. 1. | The Model of the Partnership for CSR Development in Slovenia. | 130 |
| Chapter 8 | ||
| Fig. 1. | CSR Communication: A Linguistic Approach. | 147 |
| Chapter 10 | ||
| Fig. 1. | Research Framework. | 185 |
| Chapter 14 | ||
| Fig. 1. | Antecedents of Resource and Knowledge Acquisition Process for Deep CSR Implementation. | 275 |
| Fig. 2. | Institutional Arrangement to Provide Change and Best Practice Diffusion. | 276 |
| Chapter 15 | ||
| Fig. 1. | How Cost Reduction Could Be Achieved on the Basis of Frugal Eco-innovation? | 293 |
| Fig. 2. | Step-by-Step Framework for Eco-innovation. | 295 |
| Fig. 1. | EU CSR Developments and Participation Levels: A Conceptual Trend. | 30 |
| Fig. 1. | Cube-shaped of Corporate Social Responsibility in CGC. | 41 |
| Fig. 2. | Implicit versus Explicit Approach. | 43 |
| Fig. 3. | Positioning of Countries in the Cube-shaped of Corporate Social Responsibility in CGC. | 52 |
| Fig. 1. | Depiction of Change in Ranks for Neutral Governments; Periods 2014–2015, 2015–2016, 2014–2016. | 93 |
| Fig. 2. | Depiction of Change in Ranks for Active Governments; Periods 2014–2015, 2015–16, 2014–2016. | 94 |
| Fig. 1. | The Model of the Partnership for CSR Development in Slovenia. | 130 |
| Fig. 1. | CSR Communication: A Linguistic Approach. | 147 |
| Fig. 1. | Research Framework. | 185 |
| Fig. 1. | Antecedents of Resource and Knowledge Acquisition Process for Deep CSR Implementation. | 275 |
| Fig. 2. | Institutional Arrangement to Provide Change and Best Practice Diffusion. | 276 |
| Fig. 1. | How Cost Reduction Could Be Achieved on the Basis of Frugal Eco-innovation? | 293 |
| Fig. 2. | Step-by-Step Framework for Eco-innovation. | 295 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.