SEM analysis
| Hypotheses | Relationship | SRW | t-value | p-value | Supported/Not supported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | TOL → CL | 0.773 | 10.896 | *** | Supported |
| H2 | TIV → CL | 0.559 | 8.542 | *** | Supported |
| H3 | TCL → CL | 0.792 | 11.640 | *** | Supported |
| H4 | TIS → CL | 0.506 | 8.247 | *** | Supported |
| H5 | TUC → CL | 0.499 | 7.957 | ** | Supported |
| Hypotheses | Relationship | SRW | Supported/Not supported | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOL → CL | 0.773 | 10.896 | *** | Supported | |
| TIV → CL | 0.559 | 8.542 | *** | Supported | |
| TCL → CL | 0.792 | 11.640 | *** | Supported | |
| TIS → CL | 0.506 | 8.247 | *** | Supported | |
| TUC → CL | 0.499 | 7.957 | ** | Supported |
Note(s): a. TOL = Techno-overload, TIV = echno-invasion, TCL = Techno-complexity, TIS = Techno-insecurity, TUC = Techno-uncertainty, CL = Cyber-loafing
b. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01
c. Standardised coefficients reported
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.