The nomenclature of the risk appetite model
| Nomenclature | Explanations (sets, indices, parameters, variables) |
|---|---|
| U | Set of observations, indexed by x ∈ U |
| TF | Set of the threat related to revenue loss, indexed by aij ∈ TF for all attributes |
| C | Set of conditional seaport risk attributes, indexed by aij ∈ Cj |
| Va | Set of risk magnitude {1, 2, 3, …, h} indexed by f(x,a) ∈ Va |
| e | Set of decision-makers (stakeholders) |
| Lm | Set of levels for the m-th attribute |
| J | Set of conditional seaport risk profiles aggregated from the q-th expert, J = 1, 2, …, Jq |
| i | Index of possible threats, i = 1, 2, …, n |
| j | Index of conditional seaport risk attributes, j = 1, 2, …, m |
| l | Index of decision-makers (stakeholders), l = 1, 2, …, q |
| α | The minimum required discrepancy level according to cij |
| F | The sampling fraction (the ratio of sample size to the total number of stakeholders) |
| dikj | Discrepancy between threat i-th and k-th due to conditional seaport risk j-th |
| aij | The potential risk score of risk appetite from conditional seaport risk i-th toward potential threats j-th |
| Pqj|s | The predicted probability of revenue loss of the j-th conditional seaport risk attributes by the q-th decision-maker in the sample under the scenario s-th |
| S(aijq) | Utility score of the q-th experts associated with i-th conditional seaport risk attributes for j-th potential threats |
| Part-worth for the l-th level of the m-th attribute for q-th individual | |
| Derived importance of the m-th attribute for q-th individual | |
| Derived benefit (desirability) for the l-th level of the m-th attribute for the q-th individual | |
| Self-explicated importance for the m-th attribute for q-th individual | |
| Self-explicated benefit (desirability) for the m-th attribute for the q-th individual | |
| DR | Number of design risk profile (alternative) |
| Indicator variable taking the value 1 if the m-th attribute in the DR-th profile takes level 1 | |
| Estimation score from the q-th individual to the J-th profile | |
| Z | Potentsial loss due to conditional seaport risk factors |
| Nomenclature | Explanations (sets, indices, parameters, variables) |
|---|---|
| Set of observations, indexed by | |
| Set of the threat related to revenue loss, indexed by | |
| Set of conditional seaport risk attributes, indexed by | |
| Set of risk magnitude {1, 2, 3, …, | |
| Set of decision-makers (stakeholders) | |
| Set of levels for the | |
| Set of conditional seaport risk profiles aggregated from the | |
| Index of possible threats, | |
| Index of conditional seaport risk attributes, | |
| Index of decision-makers (stakeholders), | |
| The minimum required discrepancy level according to | |
| The sampling fraction (the ratio of sample size to the total number of stakeholders) | |
| Discrepancy between threat | |
| The potential risk score of risk appetite from conditional seaport risk | |
| The predicted probability of revenue loss of the | |
| Utility score of the | |
| Part-worth for the | |
| Derived importance of the | |
| Derived benefit (desirability) for the | |
| Self-explicated importance for the | |
| Self-explicated benefit (desirability) for the | |
| Number of design risk profile (alternative) | |
| Indicator variable taking the value 1 if the | |
| Estimation score from the | |
| Potentsial loss due to conditional seaport risk factors |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.