Risk and resilience assessment resilience practices described in TAMPs
| Subcategory | Activities | States referencing activity | No. of TAMPs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk register | Includes climate change or similar as a risk | AK, AR, CA, CT, DE, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, LA, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NV, NJ, NM, ND, OH, PA, PR, RI, SC, SD, TX, VT, WI | 30 (67%) |
| Includes individual climate/event type | AZ, CO, DC, FL, HI, NE, NH, NC, OK, OR, TN, UT, VA, WA, WY | 15 (33%) | |
| Risk assessment | Baseline assessment conducted | AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, HI, IL, IA, MA, MI, MT, NJ, NM, NC, OH, OR, PA, RI, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI | 27 (60%) |
| Tool used or developed for future assessment | AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, HI, IL, IA, MA, NJ, OH, PA, RI, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI | 20 (44%) | |
| Investments prioritised based on assessment | CA, DE, HI, IL, IA, MA, OH, RI, VT, WI | 10 (22%) | |
| Criticality under disruption considered | AZ, CO, DE, HI, IL, IA, TX, UT, VT | 9 (20%) | |
| Scenario planning | Consideration of resilience funding needs | HI, IN, OR | 3 (7%) |
| Consideration of resilience impact on performance | IN | 1 (2%) |
| Subcategory | Activities | States referencing activity | No. of TAMPs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk register | Includes climate change or similar as a risk | AK, AR, CA, CT, DE, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, LA, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NV, NJ, NM, ND, OH, PA, PR, RI, SC, SD, TX, VT, WI | 30 (67%) |
| Includes individual climate/event type | AZ, CO, DC, FL, HI, NE, NH, NC, OK, OR, TN, UT, VA, WA, WY | 15 (33%) | |
| Risk assessment | Baseline assessment conducted | AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, HI, IL, IA, MA, MI, MT, NJ, NM, NC, OH, OR, PA, RI, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI | 27 (60%) |
| Tool used or developed for future assessment | AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, HI, IL, IA, MA, NJ, OH, PA, RI, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI | 20 (44%) | |
| Investments prioritised based on assessment | CA, DE, HI, IL, IA, MA, OH, RI, VT, WI | 10 (22%) | |
| Criticality under disruption considered | AZ, CO, DE, HI, IL, IA, TX, UT, VT | 9 (20%) | |
| Scenario planning | Consideration of resilience funding needs | HI, IN, OR | 3 (7%) |
| Consideration of resilience impact on performance | IN | 1 (2%) |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.