Key challenges and limitations of existing WLC frameworks
| Challenges/limitations | GA | PM1 | PM2 | PM3 | SM | A1 | A2 | SS | QS1 | QS2 | QS3 | QS4 | QS5 | QS6 | QS7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No standardised WLC approach/no unified methodology | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||
| WLC frameworks not used in residential projects | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||
| Frameworks are informal or Excel-based | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||
| Limited scope – focus mainly on costs, missing risk analysis | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||
| Lack of integration with tools like BIM | ✓ | ||||||||||||||
| Narrow cost components – missing financing/insurance/operation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Challenges/limitations | GA | PM1 | PM2 | PM3 | SM | A1 | A2 | SS | QS1 | QS2 | QS3 | QS4 | QS5 | QS6 | QS7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No standardised WLC approach/no unified methodology | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||
| WLC frameworks not used in residential projects | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||
| Frameworks are informal or Excel-based | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||
| Limited scope – focus mainly on costs, missing risk analysis | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||
| Lack of integration with tools like BIM | ✓ | ||||||||||||||
| Narrow cost components – missing financing/insurance/operation | ✓ | ✓ |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.