Recommended improvements to WLC frameworks
| Recommended improvements | GA | PM 1 | PM 2 | PM3 | SM | A1 | A2 | EE | EI | FM1 | FM2 | HO1 | HO2 | SS | QS 1 | QS 2 | QS 3 | QS 4 | QS 5 | QS 6 | QS 7 | QS 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better material evaluation methods | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||
| More emphasis on compliance costs | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stronger integration in project planning | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||
| Education and advocacy for WLC adoption | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Improvements in data integration and forecasting models | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||
| Regional climate-based modules | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Enhanced regulatory integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||
| Awareness and standardised software tools | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Better incorporation of geographical risks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||
| More real-time data integration and predictive models | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Climate change adaptation in WLC frameworks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||
| Integration of climate risk and resilience models | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||
| Use of dynamic cost modelling and risk assessment | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Recommended improvements | GA | PM 1 | PM 2 | PM3 | SM | A1 | A2 | EE | EI | FM1 | FM2 | HO1 | HO2 | SS | QS 1 | QS 2 | QS 3 | QS 4 | QS 5 | QS 6 | QS 7 | QS 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better material evaluation methods | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||
| More emphasis on compliance costs | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stronger integration in project planning | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||
| Education and advocacy for WLC adoption | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Improvements in data integration and forecasting models | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||
| Regional climate-based modules | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Enhanced regulatory integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||
| Awareness and standardised software tools | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Better incorporation of geographical risks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||
| More real-time data integration and predictive models | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Climate change adaptation in WLC frameworks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||
| Integration of climate risk and resilience models | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||
| Use of dynamic cost modelling and risk assessment | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.