Table 1

Summary of key existing literature on different focus domains and used tools/architectures frameworks

StudyZoneDomain focusBuilding typeArchitecture/Tool usedMethodologyGaps identified
Martín-Toral et al. (2019) EuropeDistrict retrofittingMixed-use urbanCloud-BIMEnergy optimisationLimited focus on heatwaves and indoor comfort
Liu et al. (2023a) AsiaTunnel safetyInfrastructureBIM + Risk Analysis ToolSafety modellingNot applicable to residential overheating
Luo et al. (2019) ChinaEnergy predictionResidentialIoT + Big Data PlatformPredictive analyticsNo comfort or risk dimension
Sood et al. (2017) IndiaFlood managementUrban systemsIoT + Cloud + GISRisk-based simulationNot heatwave specific
Biswas et al. (2024) GlobalGreen ComputingGeneralMulti-layer Cloud FrameworkEnergy efficiencyNo focus on residential or overheating risks
Meisel et al. (2017) USASmart grid riskGrid infrastructureSecure Cloud Reference ArchitectureCyber-physical analysisUnrelated to indoor thermal needs
Baba et al. (2022a,b)CanadaThermal simulationSchoolsEnergyPlus + DesignBuilderOverheating metricsLacks real-time/automated BIM input
Rahif et al. (2023) MENAOverheating in NZEBHomesPassive Design ToolsDynamic thermal simulationLacks automation or cloud integration
Current studyMulti-regionResidential heatwave assessment + mitigationResidentialCloud-BIM + SimulationsDSRIntegrates BIM + climate + Expert feedback + Risk assessment and automation
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal