Research design and methodological overview
| Data collection | Data analysis | Integration of findings | Correlation of factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fieldwork: Conducted detailed ethnographic observations and interviews with stakeholders involved in supply chains, humanitarian aid, and peacebuilding activities. Focused on seven locations across East Asia and the Pacific | Thematic analysis: Coded and categorized qualitative data to identify recurring themes related to supply chain adaptability, institutionalization, and flexibility | Framework development: Synthesized findings into the triple nexus framework to propose a restructured mechanism for enhancing humanitarian supply chains | Supply chain adaptability: Examined the relationship between the flexibility of development supply chains and their effectiveness in humanitarian contexts |
| Ethnographic observations allowed for in-depth understanding of local practices and challenges. - Interviews provided insights into stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences | Thematic coding helped in organizing data into themes that reflect the core issues and patterns observed. Cross-coding ensured consistency and reliability in data interpretation | Integrated qualitative findings into a conceptual framework that aligns with the triple nexus approach, enhancing coherence between humanitarian, development, and peacebuilding efforts | Analyzed how adaptable supply chain processes impact timely and effective humanitarian responses, focusing on flexibility in procedures and logistics |
| Case studies: Selected based on regions prone to climate change-induced disasters and high prevalence of GBV. Included 11 case studies with intensive fieldwork in seven locations. The case studies involved qualitative data collection through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and observations. Prior to the fieldwork, quantitative data was collected; questionnaires were completed by the clinics (MAs) | Comparative analysis: Conducted cross-case analysis to identify commonalities and differences in supply chain practices across different contexts. The questionnaires were coded with cross-coding to identify comparative themes that were used for generalizations across the case studies. The outcomes of the questionnaires also informed the preparation of the fieldwork | Validation: Validated findings through triangulation of data sources and expert consultations | Institutionalization: Analyzed how well-integrated supply chain processes within institutions influence overall responsiveness to SGBV crises |
| Semi-structured interviews provided flexibility to explore various issues in-depth. - Focus group discussions facilitated a broader understanding of community-level dynamics. - Observations captured real-time practices and challenges in the field | Cross-case analysis allowed for the identification of patterns and unique factors influencing supply chain effectiveness. - Comparative themes provided a basis for generalization and broader application of findings | Triangulation involved cross-referencing data from multiple sources to ensure robustness and reliability of findings - Expert consultations provided additional perspectives and validated the proposed framework | Evaluated the extent to which institutional frameworks support the integration of flexible supply chain processes, enhancing SGBV response effectiveness |
| Document analysis: Reviewed policy documents, operational reports, and existing literature to contextualize findings within the broader triple nexus framework. | Explore relationships Between identified factors and their impact on humanitarian effectiveness and peacebuilding outcomes | Collaboration: Investigated the impact of inter-agency and cross-sector collaboration on enhancing the efficiency of supply chains and achieving peacebuilding objectives | |
| Policy documents provided a regulatory and strategic context for the study. - Operational reports offered insights into practical challenges and successes. - Literature review helped in framing the research within existing theoretical and practical knowledge | Analysis: identified significant correlations between qualitative findings to understand the impact of various factors on overall supply chain effectiveness and peacebuilding efforts | Analyzed how collaboration between agencies and sectors can enhance supply chain operations and contribute to peacebuilding. - Identified best practices for inter-agency collaboration that could be replicated in similar contexts |
| Data collection | Data analysis | Integration of findings | Correlation of factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thematic analysis: Coded and categorized qualitative data to identify recurring themes related to supply chain adaptability, institutionalization, and flexibility | Framework development: Synthesized findings into the triple nexus framework to propose a restructured mechanism for enhancing humanitarian supply chains | Supply chain adaptability: Examined the relationship between the flexibility of development supply chains and their effectiveness in humanitarian contexts | |
| Thematic coding helped in organizing data into themes that reflect the core issues and patterns observed. Cross-coding ensured consistency and reliability in data interpretation | Integrated qualitative findings into a conceptual framework that aligns with the triple nexus approach, enhancing coherence between humanitarian, development, and peacebuilding efforts | Analyzed how adaptable supply chain processes impact timely and effective humanitarian responses, focusing on flexibility in procedures and logistics | |
| Comparative analysis: Conducted cross-case analysis to identify commonalities and differences in supply chain practices across different contexts. The questionnaires were coded with cross-coding to identify comparative themes that were used for generalizations across the case studies. The outcomes of the questionnaires also informed the preparation of the fieldwork | Validation: Validated findings through triangulation of data sources and expert consultations | Institutionalization: Analyzed how well-integrated supply chain processes within institutions influence overall responsiveness to SGBV crises | |
| Cross-case analysis allowed for the identification of patterns and unique factors influencing supply chain effectiveness. - Comparative themes provided a basis for generalization and broader application of findings | Triangulation involved cross-referencing data from multiple sources to ensure robustness and reliability of findings - | Evaluated the extent to which institutional frameworks support the integration of flexible supply chain processes, enhancing SGBV response effectiveness | |
| Explore relationships | Collaboration: Investigated the impact of inter-agency and cross-sector collaboration on enhancing the efficiency of supply chains and achieving peacebuilding objectives | ||
| Analysis: identified significant correlations between qualitative findings to understand the impact of various factors on overall supply chain effectiveness and peacebuilding efforts | Analyzed how collaboration between agencies and sectors can enhance supply chain operations and contribute to peacebuilding. - Identified best practices for inter-agency collaboration that could be replicated in similar contexts |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.