Table 8

Simultaneity issues

VariableCorporate profitability
(M1)(M2)(M3)(M4)
ROAROAROEROE
ESGt−10.039*** (0.010)0.037*** (0.010)0.079*** (0.029)0.108*** (0.028)
Sizet−1−0.002*** (0.001)−0.013*** (0.002)
Lev t-1−0.024*** (0.004)−0.012 (0.011)
CFLOAt−10.114*** (0.007)0.219*** (0.017)
Growtht−10.015*** (0.001)0.038*** (0.003)
Aget−1−0.000 (0.001)0.001 (0.002)
Ind_Drt−1−0.004 (0.011)0.006 (0.028)
Boardt−1−0.004 (0.003)−0.011 (0.010)
Top1t−10.012*** (0.004)0.044*** (0.012)
Dualityt−10.002 (0.001)0.004 (0.003)
Bgendert−1−0.025*** (0.004)−0.039*** (0.011)
Liqt−10.021*** (0.004)0.003*** (0.001)0.003*** (0.001)0.001*** (0.000)
Constant0.039*** (0.10)0.082*** (0.017)0.012*** (0.002)−0.065*** (0.006)
Year FEYesYesYesYes
Firm FEYesYesYesYes
Adjusted R20.0140.0920.0050.055
Obs303303303303

Note(s): This table presents results from the simultaneity approach, addressing potential endogeneity in the relationship between ESG and corporate profitability. The first-stage results in column M1 show the instrumented variable, ESG_L, while M2 reports the panel regression using the estimated ESG values. M3 and M4 examine the dynamic relationship by including a one-period lag for the independent and control variables. ***, **, and * denote significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses for all columns

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal