Table 7

The results of the mediation analysis

Influential path standardized effectStandardized path coefficientMediation result
95% CI of bias-corrected percentile method95% CI of percentile method
LowerUpperTwo-tailed test p-valueLowerUpperTwo-tailed test p-value
Environmental features → Learning persistence Mediation result: Full mediation
INT → LP      Full mediation
Direct effect−0.2140.017p > 0.05−0.2250.014p > 0.05
Indirect effect0.4350.817p < 0.0010.4310.815p < 0.001
Total effect0.3920.630p < 0.0010.3950.632p < 0.001
VRG → LP      Full mediation
Direct effect−0.1020.120p > 0.05−0.1040.117p > 0.05
Indirect effect0.5110.767p < 0.0010.5040.759p < 0.001
Total effect0.5350.732p < 0.0010.5310.730p < 0.001
Environmental features → Learning outcome Mediation result: Full mediation
INT → LO      Full mediation
Direct effect−0.0070.331p > 0.05−0.0150.321p > 0.05
Indirect effect0.1870.538p < 0.0010.1810.533p < 0.001
Total effect0.3930.613p < 0.0010.3920.612p < 0.001
VRG → LO      Full mediation
Direct effect−0.1180.260p > 0.05−0.1250.253p > 0.05
Indirect effect0.2660.611p < 0.0010.2650.608p < 0.001
Total effect0.3800.605p < 0.0010.3820.607p < 0.001
Learning engagement → Learning outcome Mediation result: Full mediation
PLE → LO      Full mediation
Direct effect−0.1660.350p > 0.05−0.1540.358p > 0.05
Indirect effect0.1090.397p < 0.0010.1030.388p < 0.001
Total effect0.0970.546p < 0.010.1150.558p < 0.01
SLE → LO      Full mediation
Direct effect−0.0280.359p > 0.05−0.0290.357p > 0.05
Indirect effect0.0980.341p < 0.0010.0910.335p < 0.001
Total effect0.1590.546p < 0.0010.1650.553p < 0.001
Source(s): The author’s own creation/work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal