Future research avenues based on conceptual structural map
| Key area | Research gap | Future research directions |
|---|---|---|
| Charging infrastructure development and user behavior | Insufficient integration of user-centric concerns (range anxiety and convenience) in infrastructure planning | Develop user-focused charging infrastructure frameworks that comprehensively address adoption barriers like range anxiety and infrastructure accessibility |
| Battery technology and vehicle-to-grid integration | Limited practical frameworks and standardized applications of battery technology and V2G integration | Explore standardized, scalable V2G integration solutions, incorporating next-generation battery technologies for practical grid interaction |
| Methodological optimization and spatial planning | Scarcity of robust optimization and spatial analytical models accommodating uncertainty and operational dynamics | Advance integrated optimization methodologies, explicitly accounting for uncertainty, spatial constraints and lifecycle impacts in planning processes |
| Environmental sustainability and emissions | Limited studies quantifying direct impacts of infrastructure strategies on emissions reduction | Quantify environmental benefits and emission reduction potentials of various infrastructure deployment strategies through targeted empirical research |
| Electric buses and public transport systems | Lack of specialized optimization models addressing the specific infrastructure and operational challenges of electric bus systems | Create tailored operational models for electric bus networks that integrate battery lifecycle management and efficient scheduling strategies |
| Lifecycle and economic assessments | Inadequate lifecycle and economic analysis in the context of varied regional deployment scenarios | Conduct detailed lifecycle assessments and economic analyses to inform policy and strategic decisions across diverse geographical and operational contexts |
| Key area | Research gap | Future research directions |
|---|---|---|
| Charging infrastructure development and user behavior | Insufficient integration of user-centric concerns (range anxiety and convenience) in infrastructure planning | Develop user-focused charging infrastructure frameworks that comprehensively address adoption barriers like range anxiety and infrastructure accessibility |
| Battery technology and vehicle-to-grid integration | Limited practical frameworks and standardized applications of battery technology and V2G integration | Explore standardized, scalable V2G integration solutions, incorporating next-generation battery technologies for practical grid interaction |
| Methodological optimization and spatial planning | Scarcity of robust optimization and spatial analytical models accommodating uncertainty and operational dynamics | Advance integrated optimization methodologies, explicitly accounting for uncertainty, spatial constraints and lifecycle impacts in planning processes |
| Environmental sustainability and emissions | Limited studies quantifying direct impacts of infrastructure strategies on emissions reduction | Quantify environmental benefits and emission reduction potentials of various infrastructure deployment strategies through targeted empirical research |
| Electric buses and public transport systems | Lack of specialized optimization models addressing the specific infrastructure and operational challenges of electric bus systems | Create tailored operational models for electric bus networks that integrate battery lifecycle management and efficient scheduling strategies |
| Lifecycle and economic assessments | Inadequate lifecycle and economic analysis in the context of varied regional deployment scenarios | Conduct detailed lifecycle assessments and economic analyses to inform policy and strategic decisions across diverse geographical and operational contexts |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.