Summary of literature reviewed to identify CSF for sustainable manufacturing
| Main criteria | Sub-criteria (CSF) | CSF code | Authors and year | Aspects of sustainability | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic | Social | Environmental | ||||
| Environmental Based CSF | Environmentally friendly practices implemented | ENV1 | Kumar et al. (2023), Yadav et al. (2021) | √ | – | √ |
| Environmental awareness | ENV2 | AlSanad (2018), Amna Farrukh et al. (2020) | – | √ | √ | |
| Waste recycling technology used | ENV3 | Amna Farrukh et al. (2020), Swarnakar et al. (2020), Wang et al. (2021), Yadav et al. (2021) | √ | √ | √ | |
| Availability of appropriate locations for waste disposal | ENV4 | Kaswan and Rajeev (2021), Swarnakar et al. (2020) | – | √ | √ | |
| Local environmental regulations | ENV5 | Cherrafi et al. (2016)/Gandhi et al. (2017) | √ | √ | – | |
| Availability of substitute raw materials in the environment | ENV6 | Amrina and Vilsi (2015), Singh et al. (2018) | √ | – | √ | |
| Harmful emissions generated | ENV7 | Amrina and Vilsi (2015)/, Moktadir et al. (2020), Singh et al. (2018) | √ | √ | ||
| Carbon capture and storage technology use | ENV8 | Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Gandhi et al. (2017) | √ | √ | ||
| Amount of water used | ENV9 | Amrina and Vilsi (2015)/Moktadir et al. (2020) | √ | – | √ | |
| Environmentally-friendly transportation | ENV10 | Izumi et al. (2021)/Kumar et al. (2023a, b)/Belhadi et al. (2021) | – | √ | √ | |
| Social Based CSF | Demand for Green/Sustainable products | SOC1 | AlSanad (2018)/Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kaswan and Rajeev (2021)/Kumar et al. (2023a, b)/Wang et al. (2021) | √ | √ | – |
| Effective communication among workers | SOC2 | Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kumar et al. (2023a, b)/Venugopal and Saleeshya (2019) | – | √ | √ | |
| Organisational response to customer demands | SOC3 | Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kaswan and Rajeev (2021)/Kumar et al. (2023a, b)/Swarnakar et al. (2020) | √ | √ | – | |
| Organisation's relationship with suppliers | SOC4 | Cherrafi et al. (2016))/Kumar et al. (2023a, b)/Yadav et al. (2021) | √ | √ | – | |
| Quality of training provided to workers | SOC5 | Amrina and Vilsi (2015)/Amrina et al. (2016)/ Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kaswan and Rajeev (2021)/Kumar et al. (2023a, b)/Swarnakar et al. (2020)/Wang et al. (2021) | – | √ | – | |
| Level of involvement and support of top management | SOC6 | Cherrafi et al. (2016)/Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kaswan and Rajeev (2021)/Kumar et al. (2023a, b)/Swarnakar et al. (2020)/Yadav et al. (2021) | √ | √ | – | |
| Employees' adaptability to changes in work practices | SOC7 | AlSanad (2018)/Wang et al. (2021)/Hanim et al. (2017) | – | √ | – | |
| Workplace safety and accident prevention | SOC8 | Amrina and Vilsi (2015)/Moktadir et al. (2020)/Singh et al. (2018) | – | √ | – | |
| Availability of local and international sustainability-focused agencies | SOC9 | AlSanad (2018)/Kaswan and Rajeev (2021)/Found et al. (2018) | – | √ | √ | |
| Level of occupational health and safety | SOC10 | Amrina and Vilsi (2015)/Amrina et al. (2016)/Moktadir et al. (2020)/Singh et al. (2018) | – | √ | – | |
| Economical Based CSF | Impact of inventory cost | ECO1 | Amrina and Vilsi (2015)/Amrina et al. (2016)/Singh et al. (2018) | √ | – | – |
| The financial impact of using an alternate or substitute material is “cost and consumption.” | ECO2 | Amrina et al. (2016)/Jamwal et al. (2022)/Barcia et al. (2022) | √ | – | √ | |
| The plant's infrastructure constraints hinder sustainability adoption financially | ECO3 | AlSanad (2018)/Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kaswan and Rajeev (2021) | √ | – | √ | |
| LSS tools and methods are assigned to solve problems that arise | ECO4 | Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Yadav et al. (2021) | √ | – | √ | |
| Energy cost and consumption level | ECO5 | Amrina and Vilsi (2015)/Amrina et al. (2016)/Russo and Camanho (2015) | √ | √ | – | |
| Adequacy of R&D funding for sustainable manufacturing solutions | ECO6 | Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kumar et al. (2023a, b)/Sangwan et al. (2018) | √ | √ | – | |
| Using LSS tools to mitigate the cost of product reuse, remanufacturing and material recovery | ECO7 | Gandhi et al. (2017)/Moktadir et al. (2020)/Mokhtar and Nasooti (2020) | √ | √ | – | |
| LSS tools and methods are used to create and utilise “finance and resources properly.” | ECO8 | Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kaswan and Rajeev (2021)/Yadav et al. (2021) | √ | – | √ | |
| A degree of return on investment can be expected from transitioning to fully green manufacturing | ECO9 | Kaswan and Rajeev (2021)/Moktadir et al. (2020)/Wang et al. (2021) | √ | – | √ | |
| Adopting sustainable manufacturing methods in new market opportunities and expansion | ECO10 | Amna Farrukh et al. (2020)/Kaswan and Rajeev (2021)/Wang et al. (2021)/Yadav et al. (2021) | √ | √ | – | |
| Main criteria | Sub-criteria (CSF) | CSF code | Authors and year | Aspects of sustainability | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic | Social | Environmental | ||||
| Environmental Based CSF | Environmentally friendly practices implemented | ENV1 | √ | – | √ | |
| Environmental awareness | ENV2 | – | √ | √ | ||
| Waste recycling technology used | ENV3 | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Availability of appropriate locations for waste disposal | ENV4 | – | √ | √ | ||
| Local environmental regulations | ENV5 | √ | √ | – | ||
| Availability of substitute raw materials in the environment | ENV6 | √ | – | √ | ||
| Harmful emissions generated | ENV7 | √ | √ | |||
| Carbon capture and storage technology use | ENV8 | √ | √ | |||
| Amount of water used | ENV9 | √ | – | √ | ||
| Environmentally-friendly transportation | ENV10 | – | √ | √ | ||
| Social Based CSF | Demand for Green/Sustainable products | SOC1 | √ | √ | – | |
| Effective communication among workers | SOC2 | – | √ | √ | ||
| Organisational response to customer demands | SOC3 | √ | √ | – | ||
| Organisation's relationship with suppliers | SOC4 | √ | √ | – | ||
| Quality of training provided to workers | SOC5 | – | √ | – | ||
| Level of involvement and support of top management | SOC6 | √ | √ | – | ||
| Employees' adaptability to changes in work practices | SOC7 | – | √ | – | ||
| Workplace safety and accident prevention | SOC8 | – | √ | – | ||
| Availability of local and international sustainability-focused agencies | SOC9 | – | √ | √ | ||
| Level of occupational health and safety | SOC10 | – | √ | – | ||
| Economical Based CSF | Impact of inventory cost | ECO1 | √ | – | – | |
| The financial impact of using an alternate or substitute material is “cost and consumption.” | ECO2 | √ | – | √ | ||
| The plant's infrastructure constraints hinder sustainability adoption financially | ECO3 | √ | – | √ | ||
| LSS tools and methods are assigned to solve problems that arise | ECO4 | √ | – | √ | ||
| Energy cost and consumption level | ECO5 | √ | √ | – | ||
| Adequacy of R&D funding for sustainable manufacturing solutions | ECO6 | √ | √ | – | ||
| Using LSS tools to mitigate the cost of product reuse, remanufacturing and material recovery | ECO7 | √ | √ | – | ||
| LSS tools and methods are used to create and utilise “finance and resources properly.” | ECO8 | √ | – | √ | ||
| A degree of return on investment can be expected from transitioning to fully green manufacturing | ECO9 | √ | – | √ | ||
| Adopting sustainable manufacturing methods in new market opportunities and expansion | ECO10 | √ | √ | – | ||
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.