Results of logistic regression of equation (1) including the square term for age
| Variables | Coefficient | Marginal effects |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.050** | 0.001** |
| (0.025) | (0.001) | |
| Age squared | −0.000*** | −0.000*** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | |
| Bank trust – yes | 0.303** | 0.0065** |
| (0.124) | (0.003) | |
| High school | 0.905** | 0.0142*** |
| (0.362) | (0.004) | |
| Tertiary education | 1.761*** | 0.045*** |
| (0.380) | (0.008) | |
| Coloured | −0.421** | −0.008*** |
| (0.172) | (0.003) | |
| Asian | −0.767*** | −0.013*** |
| (0.238) | (0.003) | |
| White | −0.318** | −0.007** |
| (0.159) | (0.003) | |
| Female | −0.170* | −0.004* |
| (0.098) | (0.002) | |
| Rural | −0.041 | −0.001 |
| (0.160) | (0.003) | |
| R1–R1,999 | 1.169*** | 0.016*** |
| (0.259) | (0.002) | |
| R2,000–R5,999 | 2.410*** | 0.055*** |
| (0.262) | (0.006) | |
| R6,000 and above | 2.805*** | 0.081*** |
| (0.280) | (0.012) | |
| LSM 3–4 | −0.810* | −0.013 |
| (0.484) | (0.011) | |
| LSM 5–6 | −0.105 | −0.002 |
| (0.449) | (0.011) | |
| LSM 7–8 | 0.445 | 0.013 |
| (0.464) | (0.012) | |
| LSM 9–10 | 0.803* | 0.029** |
| (0.481) | (0.015) | |
| Married | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| (0.112) | (0.003) | |
| 2010 year | 2.421*** | 0.040*** |
| (0.211) | (0.006) | |
| 2012 year | 2.413*** | 0.039*** |
| (0.199) | (0.004) | |
| 2016 year | 2.449*** | 0.040*** |
| (0.189) | (0.004) | |
| Constant | −8.084*** | |
| (0.637) | ||
| Observations | 11,762 | 11,762 |
| Region FE | Yes | Yes |
| Year FE | Yes | Yes |
| Pseudo R-squared | 0.310 |
| Variables | Coefficient | Marginal effects |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.050** | 0.001** |
| (0.025) | (0.001) | |
| Age squared | −0.000*** | −0.000*** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | |
| Bank trust – yes | 0.303** | 0.0065** |
| (0.124) | (0.003) | |
| High school | 0.905** | 0.0142*** |
| (0.362) | (0.004) | |
| Tertiary education | 1.761*** | 0.045*** |
| (0.380) | (0.008) | |
| Coloured | −0.421** | −0.008*** |
| (0.172) | (0.003) | |
| Asian | −0.767*** | −0.013*** |
| (0.238) | (0.003) | |
| White | −0.318** | −0.007** |
| (0.159) | (0.003) | |
| Female | −0.170* | −0.004* |
| (0.098) | (0.002) | |
| Rural | −0.041 | −0.001 |
| (0.160) | (0.003) | |
| R1–R1,999 | 1.169*** | 0.016*** |
| (0.259) | (0.002) | |
| R2,000–R5,999 | 2.410*** | 0.055*** |
| (0.262) | (0.006) | |
| R6,000 and above | 2.805*** | 0.081*** |
| (0.280) | (0.012) | |
| LSM 3–4 | −0.810* | −0.013 |
| (0.484) | (0.011) | |
| LSM 5–6 | −0.105 | −0.002 |
| (0.449) | (0.011) | |
| LSM 7–8 | 0.445 | 0.013 |
| (0.464) | (0.012) | |
| LSM 9–10 | 0.803* | 0.029** |
| (0.481) | (0.015) | |
| Married | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| (0.112) | (0.003) | |
| 2010 year | 2.421*** | 0.040*** |
| (0.211) | (0.006) | |
| 2012 year | 2.413*** | 0.039*** |
| (0.199) | (0.004) | |
| 2016 year | 2.449*** | 0.040*** |
| (0.189) | (0.004) | |
| Constant | −8.084*** | |
| (0.637) | ||
| Observations | 11,762 | 11,762 |
| Region FE | Yes | Yes |
| Year FE | Yes | Yes |
| Pseudo | 0.310 |
Note(s): Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. *, **, and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% level, respectively. Reference categories: No trust in banks, primary school education, Black, male, urban, no income, LSM 1–2, unmarried
Source(s): Authors’ own work