Table 2

Literature on mobile wallets

SourceContextModelSample sizeVariables studied
Davis (1989) TAMTAM PU, PEOU
Ma and Liu (2004) TAM: a meta-anaylsis of empirical findingsTAM26 studiesPEOU, PU, TA
Shin (2009) Mobile walletUTAUT383PU, PEOU, Behavior, Security, Self-efficacy, Social Influence, trust
Amin et al. (2014) Mobile WebsitesTAM and Trust theory302PEOU, PU, Satisfaction and trust
Campbell and Singh (2017) Mobile walletTAM100PU, PE, Innovativeness and Behavioral Intention
Bagla and Sancheti (2018) Digital WalletExtended TAM313PU, PEOU, Trust, Cost, Compatibility and Mobility
Singh et al. (2019) Mobile WalletTAM, UTAUT2206PEOU, PU, PR Attitude, Intention, Satisfaction, Stress, Social Influence
Chawla and Joshi (2019) Mobile WalletTAM, UTAUT744PEOU, PU, trust, Attitude, Security, lifestyle choice and Factor in environment
Chalwa and Joshi (2020) Mobile WalletExtended TAM744PEO, PU, security, safety, lifestyle compatibility and moderating role of gender and age
Pertiwi et al. (2020) E−WalletTAM216PU, PEOU and Behavioral Intention
Kavitha and Kannan (2020) Mobile Payment SystemTAM200PU, PEOU, PS, PR and Consumer Attitude
Gupta et al. (2023) Mobile WalletsTAM250Value, Compatibility, enjoyment, social influence, service Satisfaction, Service Trust and Behavioral intention
Husainah et al. (2022) Digital WalletExtended TAM360PEOU, PU, trust, Attitude, Security and Actual usage
Karim et al. (2022) E− WalletTAM480PEOU, PU, Security, Self-efficacy and Trust
Source(s): Authors' collection
[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal