Table 2 Results of the confirmatory...

Table 2

Results of the confirmatory factor analyses of study measures

Model	χ²	df	χ²/df	Δχ²(Δdf)	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	SRMR
EE, SSG, JSE, PS, CWB	466.421	289	1.61	–	0.983	0.980	0.038	0.031
EE, SSG + JSE, PS, CWB	2665.267	293	9.10	20198.846(4)	0.767	0.741	0.137	0.153
EE, SSG + PS + CWB, JSE	3474.043	296	11.74	3007.622(7)	0.687	0.657	0.157	0.172
EE + SSG + PS + CWB, JSE	5983.745	298	20.08	5517.324(9)	0.441	0.390	0.210	0.212
EE, SSG, JSE, PS, CWB	8159.772	299	27.29	7693.351(10)	0.227	0.160	0.246	0.256

Model	χ²	df	χ²/df	Δχ²(Δdf)	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	SRMR
EE, SSG, JSE, PS, CWB	466.421	289	1.61	–	0.983	0.980	0.038	0.031
EE, SSG + JSE, PS, CWB	2665.267	293	9.10	20198.846(4)	0.767	0.741	0.137	0.153
EE, SSG + PS + CWB, JSE	3474.043	296	11.74	3007.622(7)	0.687	0.657	0.157	0.172
EE + SSG + PS + CWB, JSE	5983.745	298	20.08	5517.324(9)	0.441	0.390	0.210	0.212
EE, SSG, JSE, PS, CWB	8159.772	299	27.29	7693.351(10)	0.227	0.160	0.246	0.256

Note(s): n = 434. EE = Emotional exhaustion; SSG = Supervisor-subordinate guanxi; JSE = Job self-efficacy; PS = Psychological entitlement; CWB = Counterproductive work behaviors; CFI = Comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA = Root mean square of approximation; SRMR = Standardized root mean square residual

Source(s): Authors’ work

[ViewLarge]