Latent means, standard deviations, latent variable correlations, and scale reliabilities (omega)
| M | SD | FC T1 | ICP T1 | RC T2 | LF T2 | DER | Age | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency of change T1 | 5.03 | 1.12 | ω = 0.83 | – | – | – | – | |
| Involvement in change planning T1 | 4.77 | 1.04 | −0.06 | ω = 0.75 | – | – | – | |
| Role clarity T2 | 3.64 | 0.63 | −0.20*** | 0.47*** | ω = 0.79 | – | – | |
| Laissez-faire leadership T2 | 1.25 | 0.32 | 0.01 | −0.13** | −0.34*** | ω = 0.73 | – | |
| Difficulty in emotional regulation | 2.07 | 0.65 | 0.08 | −0.08 | −0.27*** | 0.29*** | ω = 0.91 | – |
| Age | 48.93 | 10.33 | −0.14*** | 0.07 | 0.24*** | −0.12** | −0.23*** | – |
| Gender | 1.48 | 0.50 | 0.23*** | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.07 | 0.01 | −0.10** |
| FC T1 | ICP T1 | RC T2 | LF T2 | DER | Age | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency of change T1 | 5.03 | 1.12 | – | – | – | – | ||
| Involvement in change planning T1 | 4.77 | 1.04 | −0.06 | – | – | – | ||
| Role clarity T2 | 3.64 | 0.63 | −0.20*** | 0.47*** | – | – | ||
| Laissez-faire leadership T2 | 1.25 | 0.32 | 0.01 | −0.13** | −0.34*** | – | ||
| Difficulty in emotional regulation | 2.07 | 0.65 | 0.08 | −0.08 | −0.27*** | 0.29*** | – | |
| Age | 48.93 | 10.33 | −0.14*** | 0.07 | 0.24*** | −0.12** | −0.23*** | – |
| Gender | 1.48 | 0.50 | 0.23*** | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.07 | 0.01 | −0.10** |
Note(s): N = 767, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. M = mean, SD = standard deviation. Reliabilities (omega) are presented on the diagonal. FC = Frequency of change, ICP = Involvement in change planning, RC = Role clarity, LF = Laissez-faire leadership, DER = Difficulty in emotional regulation. Gender: 1 = Male, 2 = Female, T1 = Time 1 (baseline), T2 = Time 2 (follow-up)
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.