Table 2 Indirect effects Relation... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

Indirect effects

Relation	Estimate	SE	p value	95% Cl
FC T1 → LF T2
Total	−0.006	0.047	0.903	[−0.096, 0.085]
Direct	−0.050	0.048	0.293	[−0.140, 0.045]
Indirect (RC T2)	0.052	0.016	0.004	[0.017, 0.079]
Sensitivity Analyses
Indirect (RC T2) with XM interaction	0.049	0.019	0.008	[0.020, 0.095]
Indirect (RC T2) based on factor scores on factor scores	0.052	0.013	0.000	[0.029, 0.079]
IPC T1 → LF T2
Total	−0.106	0.046	0.000	[−0.196, −0.013]
Direct	0.023	0.057	0.679	[−0.082, 0.135]
Indirect (RC T2)	−0.129	0.030	0.000	[−0.195, −0.074]
Sensitivity analyses
Indirect (RC T2) with XM interaction	−0.133	0.034	0.000	[−0.214, −0.075]
Indirect (RC T2) based on factor scores on factor scores	−0.182	0.035	0.000	[−0.255, −0.117]

Relation	Estimate	SE	p value	95% Cl
FC T1 → LF T2
Total	−0.006	0.047	0.903	[−0.096, 0.085]
Direct	−0.050	0.048	0.293	[−0.140, 0.045]
Indirect (RC T2)	0.052	0.016	0.004	[0.017, 0.079]
Sensitivity Analyses
Indirect (RC T2) with XM interaction	0.049	0.019	0.008	[0.020, 0.095]
Indirect (RC T2) based on factor scores on factor scores	0.052	0.013	0.000	[0.029, 0.079]
IPC T1 → LF T2
Total	−0.106	0.046	0.000	[−0.196, −0.013]
Direct	0.023	0.057	0.679	[−0.082, 0.135]
Indirect (RC T2)	−0.129	0.030	0.000	[−0.195, −0.074]
Sensitivity analyses
Indirect (RC T2) with XM interaction	−0.133	0.034	0.000	[−0.214, −0.075]
Indirect (RC T2) based on factor scores on factor scores	−0.182	0.035	0.000	[−0.255, −0.117]

Note(s): N = 767, FC = Frequency of change, IPC = Involvement in change planning, RC = Role clarity, LF = Laissez-faire leadership. T1 = Time 1 (baseline), T2 = Time 2 (follow-up)

Source(s): Authors’ own work