Overview of empirical studies
| Author/Year | Research approach | Purpose | Theory/Perspective/Model | Nationality | Sample and size (n = ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bárcia De Mattos et al. (2021) | Qualitative: Interviews | Effects of automation on employment and reshoring to determine implications for supply chain management and production | Supply chain management perspective | US, Europe & Asia | Workers from 5 factories (n = 8) |
| Birkel et al. (2019) | Qualitative: Interviews | Development of a risk framework for Industry 4.0 in the context of sustainability | Risk assessment theory | Germany | Managers in manufacturing sector (n = 14) |
| Brougham and Haar (2018) | Mixed methods: Survey and open-ended question | Determined worker’s awareness of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) and effects on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, turnover intention, cynicism and depression | Organizational commitment theory | New Zealand | General working population (n = 120) |
| Chao et al. (2017) | Experimental study (lab controlled) | Explored the effects of three-dimensional virtual reality and traditional training methods on mental workload and training performance in complex maintenance tasks | Cognitive theories | China | Students (n = 48) |
| Cunha et al. (2022) | Qualitative: Inductive approach | Effects of automation on body techniques | Physical Ergonomics | Portugal | Workers in Cork manufacturing (n = 12) |
| Egana-delSol et al. (2022) | Quantitative comparative analysis | Assessed the risk of automation for female and male workers in four Latin American countries – Bolivia, Chile, Colombia and El Salvador | Task based approach | Latin America | Workers from 4 Latin American countries (n = 6,602) |
| Fornino and Manera (2022) | Quantitative modeling | Automation and the future of work: Assessing the role of labor flexibility | Task based approach | US | Various manufacturing industries (not available) |
| Gangwar and Date (2016) | Quantitative: Survey | Critical factors of cloud computing adoption in organizations: An empirical study | Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) | India | Workers in various manufacturing companies (n = 280) |
| Gerdenitsch et al. (2022) | Mixed methods:Experimental (lab controlled) and semi-structured interviews | Workers' experiences of sense of autonomy with AR-based assistance systems | Job Characteristics model | Austria | General population and students (n = 117) |
| Ghadimi et al. (2022) | Quantitative: Survey | An analysis and prioritization of risks in Irish industry with implementation of industry 4.0 in manufacturing | Not identified | Ireland | Professionals in manufacturing industry (n = 12) |
| Gong et al. (2019) | Experimental task and questionnaire | Determined effects of virtual reality support to factory layout planning | Not identified | Sweden | Workers (n = 49) |
| Hopko and Mehta (2022) | Experimental study (Lab controlled) | Determined trust in shared-space collaborative robots from a neuroscience perspective | Neuroergonomics | US | Engineering students (n = 16) |
| Hopko et al. (2023) | Experimental (lab controlled): Physiological/Neurological (HRV & ECG) | Physiological and perceptual consequences of trust in collaborative robots | Neuroergonomics | US | Engineering students (n = 16) |
| Keller et al. (2020) | Experimental study (lab controlled) | Determined the effect of digital assistance on process complexity and employee competence in industrial assembly | Not identified | Germany | Students in Technical fields (n = 30) |
| Kumar et al. (2022) | Quantitative: Survey | Developed a framework for assessing social acceptability of industry 4.0 technologies for the development of digital manufacturing | Theory of socio-technical transition (TSTT) and social cognition theory (SCT) | India | Experts in manufacturing sector (n = 125) |
| Lasota and Shah (2015) | Experimental study (lab controlled) and questionnaires | The effects of human-aware motion planning on team fluency, human satisfaction, and perceived safety and comfort | Not identified | US | Students/Post graduates in Technical fields (n = 20) |
| Lordan and Stringer (2022) | Quantitative: Survey | Job automation risk on mental health and life satisfaction | Mental health model | Australia | General working population (n = 41,923) |
| Lowe et al. (2022) | Case studies | Looked at influence of industrial robots and automation on type of injuries, productivity and worker acceptance | Occupational Health & Safety | US | Workers (n = 63) |
| Marinescu et al. (2023) | Experimental study (lab controlled) and questionnaires | People’s perceptions of digital technologies in manufacturing as positive or negative (utopian vs dystopian) | Human factors and Ergonomics | UK | Adults of general population (varying degrees of knowledge of manufacturing field) (n = 134) |
| Marques et al. (2022) | Qualitative: Participatory and focus group | Problem-solving abilities and level of technological literacy in collaboration with Augmented reality | Not identified | Portugal | Experienced specialists in manufacturing field + professor + PhD student (n = 9) |
| Matsas and Vosniakos (2017) | Experimental study (lab controlled) and questionnaires | The effects of a virtual reality training system for human–robot collaboration in manufacturing tasks | Not identified | Greece | Mechanical engineering student (n = 30) |
| Meissner et al. (2020) | Qualitative: Semi-structured interviews | Looked at assembly workers' level of acceptance of human–robot collaboration | Theory of reasoned action (TRA) and Theory of planned behavior (TPB) | Germany | Workers from 4 manufacturing companies (n = 17) |
| Nakanishi and Sato (2015) | Experimental study (lab controlled) and questionnaires | Looked at behavioral, physiological, and psychological effects on workers in application of digital manuals with a retinal imaging display in manufacturing | Information-processing theory | Japan | University students (n = 29) |
| Palumbo et al. (2022) | Quantitative: Questionnaires | Psychosocial risks at work with regards to various digital technologies | Organizational Health & Safety, Organizational excellence theory | European countries | Workers/Personnel from service and manufacturing sectors (n = 5,673) |
| Panchetti et al. (2023) | Experimental and Questionnaires | The relationship between cognitive workload, workstation design, user acceptance and trust in collaborative robots | Technology acceptance model (TAM), Cognitive ergonomics | Italy | Academic personnel part of Smart Lab (n = 14) |
| Papetti et al. (2020) | Experimental, postural and physiological measures | Looked at workers' well-being in human-centered connected factories | Human factors/Ergonomics | Italy | Operators in manufacturing sectors (n = 2) |
| Papetti et al. (2021) | Case study | Ergonomic manufacturing equipment through a human-centered methodology | Human factors/Ergonomics The Human, Technology, Organisation (HTO) model | Italy | Operators in manufacturing sectors (not available) |
| Thylén et al. (2023) | Case studies | Challenges in introducing automated guided vehicles in a production facility | It builds on socio-technical systems theory and includes three separate subsystems: human, technical, and organizational and it facilitates understanding of the interactions between them | Sweden | Operators, team leaders and engineers (n = 17) |
| Wixted et al. (2018) | Quantitative: Questionnaires | Distress and worry as mediators in the relationship between psychosocial risks and upper body musculoskeletal complaints in highly automated manufacturing | Physical Ergonomics, Job demand control theory | Ireland | Workers in manufacturing sectors (n = 235) |
| Author/Year | Research approach | Purpose | Theory/Perspective/Model | Nationality | Sample and size (n = ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative: Interviews | Effects of automation on employment and reshoring to determine implications for supply chain management and production | Supply chain management perspective | US, Europe & Asia | Workers from 5 factories (n = 8) | |
| Qualitative: Interviews | Development of a risk framework for Industry 4.0 in the context of sustainability | Risk assessment theory | Germany | Managers in manufacturing sector (n = 14) | |
| Mixed methods: Survey and open-ended question | Determined worker’s awareness of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) and effects on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, turnover intention, cynicism and depression | Organizational commitment theory | New Zealand | General working population (n = 120) | |
| Experimental study (lab controlled) | Explored the effects of three-dimensional virtual reality and traditional training methods on mental workload and training performance in complex maintenance tasks | Cognitive theories | China | Students (n = 48) | |
| Qualitative: Inductive approach | Effects of automation on body techniques | Physical Ergonomics | Portugal | Workers in Cork manufacturing (n = 12) | |
| Quantitative comparative analysis | Assessed the risk of automation for female and male workers in four Latin American countries – Bolivia, Chile, Colombia and El Salvador | Task based approach | Latin America | Workers from 4 Latin American countries (n = 6,602) | |
| Quantitative modeling | Automation and the future of work: Assessing the role of labor flexibility | Task based approach | US | Various manufacturing industries (not available) | |
| Quantitative: Survey | Critical factors of cloud computing adoption in organizations: An empirical study | Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) | India | Workers in various manufacturing companies (n = 280) | |
| Mixed methods:Experimental (lab controlled) and semi-structured interviews | Workers' experiences of sense of autonomy with AR-based assistance systems | Job Characteristics model | Austria | General population and students (n = 117) | |
| Quantitative: Survey | An analysis and prioritization of risks in Irish industry with implementation of industry 4.0 in manufacturing | Not identified | Ireland | Professionals in manufacturing industry (n = 12) | |
| Experimental task and questionnaire | Determined effects of virtual reality support to factory layout planning | Not identified | Sweden | Workers (n = 49) | |
| Experimental study (Lab controlled) | Determined trust in shared-space collaborative robots from a neuroscience perspective | Neuroergonomics | US | Engineering students (n = 16) | |
| Experimental (lab controlled): Physiological/Neurological (HRV & ECG) | Physiological and perceptual consequences of trust in collaborative robots | Neuroergonomics | US | Engineering students (n = 16) | |
| Experimental study (lab controlled) | Determined the effect of digital assistance on process complexity and employee competence in industrial assembly | Not identified | Germany | Students in Technical fields (n = 30) | |
| Quantitative: Survey | Developed a framework for assessing social acceptability of industry 4.0 technologies for the development of digital manufacturing | Theory of socio-technical transition (TSTT) and social cognition theory (SCT) | India | Experts in manufacturing sector (n = 125) | |
| Experimental study (lab controlled) and questionnaires | The effects of human-aware motion planning on team fluency, human satisfaction, and perceived safety and comfort | Not identified | US | Students/Post graduates in Technical fields (n = 20) | |
| Quantitative: Survey | Job automation risk on mental health and life satisfaction | Mental health model | Australia | General working population (n = 41,923) | |
| Case studies | Looked at influence of industrial robots and automation on type of injuries, productivity and worker acceptance | Occupational Health & Safety | US | Workers (n = 63) | |
| Experimental study (lab controlled) and questionnaires | People’s perceptions of digital technologies in manufacturing as positive or negative (utopian vs dystopian) | Human factors and Ergonomics | UK | Adults of general population (varying degrees of knowledge of manufacturing field) (n = 134) | |
| Qualitative: Participatory and focus group | Problem-solving abilities and level of technological literacy in collaboration with Augmented reality | Not identified | Portugal | Experienced specialists in manufacturing field + professor + PhD student (n = 9) | |
| Experimental study (lab controlled) and questionnaires | The effects of a virtual reality training system for human–robot collaboration in manufacturing tasks | Not identified | Greece | Mechanical engineering student (n = 30) | |
| Qualitative: Semi-structured interviews | Looked at assembly workers' level of acceptance of human–robot collaboration | Theory of reasoned action (TRA) and Theory of planned behavior (TPB) | Germany | Workers from 4 manufacturing companies (n = 17) | |
| Experimental study (lab controlled) and questionnaires | Looked at behavioral, physiological, and psychological effects on workers in application of digital manuals with a retinal imaging display in manufacturing | Information-processing theory | Japan | University students (n = 29) | |
| Quantitative: Questionnaires | Psychosocial risks at work with regards to various digital technologies | Organizational Health & Safety, Organizational excellence theory | European countries | Workers/Personnel from service and manufacturing sectors (n = 5,673) | |
| Experimental and Questionnaires | The relationship between cognitive workload, workstation design, user acceptance and trust in collaborative robots | Technology acceptance model (TAM), Cognitive ergonomics | Italy | Academic personnel part of Smart Lab (n = 14) | |
| Experimental, postural and physiological measures | Looked at workers' well-being in human-centered connected factories | Human factors/Ergonomics | Italy | Operators in manufacturing sectors (n = 2) | |
| Case study | Ergonomic manufacturing equipment through a human-centered methodology | Human factors/Ergonomics The Human, Technology, Organisation (HTO) model | Italy | Operators in manufacturing sectors (not available) | |
| Case studies | Challenges in introducing automated guided vehicles in a production facility | It builds on socio-technical systems theory and includes three separate subsystems: human, technical, and organizational and it facilitates understanding of the interactions between them | Sweden | Operators, team leaders and engineers (n = 17) | |
| Quantitative: Questionnaires | Distress and worry as mediators in the relationship between psychosocial risks and upper body musculoskeletal complaints in highly automated manufacturing | Physical Ergonomics, Job demand control theory | Ireland | Workers in manufacturing sectors (n = 235) |
Source(s): Author’s own creation/work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.