| Oblim Rotated Loadingse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Factor 1 Online Teaching Enjoyment | Factor 2 Online Discussion Super. | ||
| The online environment is: | ||||
| ONL1 | Pleasurable | 6.00 (1.52)a | .843 | –.119 |
| ONL2 | Exciting | 5.51 (1.59)b | .632 | .252 |
| ONL3 | Fun | 5.81 (1.30)c | .866 | –.002 |
| Comparing online classroom discussion to the traditional classroom | ||||
| SUP1 | The online classroom facilitates more substantive discussion | 3.67 (1.95)d | .061 | .813 |
| SUP2 | Within a course, there will be a more equitable distribution of participation in online discussion | 2.94 (1.79) | –.001 | .856 |
| SUP3 | Because of anonymity, debate will increase with students and faculty members | 3.45 (1.81) | .218 | .652 |
| SUP4 | Faculty members who ask students who dominate discussions groups to speak less will have a more equal distribution of participation among students | 3.93 (1.60) | –.115 | .561 |
| Factor diagnostics | ||||
| Eigenvalue | 2.88 | 1.36 | ||
| Cumulative variance explained | 41.17% | 60.52% | ||
| ONL1 | Pleasurable | 6.00 (1.52)a | .843 | –.119 |
| ONL2 | Exciting | 5.51 (1.59)b | .632 | .252 |
| ONL3 | Fun | 5.81 (1.30)c | .866 | –.002 |
| SUP1 | The online classroom facilitates more substantive discussion | 3.67 (1.95)d | .061 | .813 |
| SUP2 | Within a course, there will be a more equitable distribution of participation in online discussion | 2.94 (1.79) | –.001 | .856 |
| SUP3 | Because of anonymity, debate will increase with students and faculty members | 3.45 (1.81) | .218 | .652 |
| SUP4 | Faculty members who ask students who dominate discussions groups to speak less will have a more equal distribution of participation among students | 3.93 (1.60) | –.115 | .561 |
| Factor diagnostics | ||||
| Eigenvalue | 2.88 | 1.36 | ||
| Cumulative variance explained | 41.17% | 60.52% | ||
Scale was anchored with 1, do not find it pleasurable; … 7, find it pleasurable (reverse coded for analysis)
Scale was anchored with 1, exciting; … 7, unexciting
Scale was anchored with 1, not fun; … 7, fun (reverse coded for analysis)
Scales were anchored with 1, strongly agree; … 7, strongly disagree
Factor analysis yielded only two factors with eigenvalues larger than the requisite 1.0 and the next “factor” had an eigenvalue of .894. Two factors were identified through the scree plot, and the two-factor model is interpretable.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.