| Question Wording | Response Scale | Descriptive Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| The assignments in this course were fair | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | N = 264, M = 4.21, SD = 0.86 |
| It was difficult to see how the material in this class was connected to the assignments (reversed) | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | N = 263, M = 3.54, SD = 1.34 |
| The syllabus material is clearly presented | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | N = 265, M = 4.27, SD = 0.92 |
| The course content makes me more interested in taking this class | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | N = 264, M = 3.85, SD = 0.98 |
| This course was well organized | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | N = 264, M = 4.05, SD = 0.98 |
| Summative measure of student evaluations of the course | Scale from 2 to 25 | N = 262, M = 19.95, SD = 3.49 |
| The assignments in this course were fair | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | |
| It was difficult to see how the material in this class was connected to the assignments (reversed) | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | |
| The syllabus material is clearly presented | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | |
| The course content makes me more interested in taking this class | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | |
| This course was well organized | Likert agreement, 1 to 5 | |
| Summative measure of student evaluations of the course | Scale from 2 to 25 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.