Table 2

Results of the multi-level model

Dependent variableEPMHRMAC
M0 – Intercept onlyM1 – With predictorsM2 – With cross-level interactionM3-mediation 1M4- mediation 2
Fixed partBSEBSEBSEBSEBSE
Intercept3.785***0.0892.527***0.5852.612***0.5334.445 ***0.4062.656***0.187
Gender (0 = male)  −0.0310.051−0.0320.0510.149*0.0640.0410.064
Yrs. of experience in dept.  0.0300.0430.0300.0440.148*0.0610.099*0.049
ES-R quality  0.337***0.031    0.249***0.035
EPMHRM      0.332***0.0650.254***0.044
SPMHRM  0.298*0.1340.278*0.1180.0500.084  
SPMHRM (indirect effect via EPMHRM)      0.093*0.045  
ES-R quality (Indirect effect via EPMHRM)        0.086***0.017
ES-R quality * SPMHRM    0.0570.048    
Random part
Variance residual (EPMHRM0.360***0.0400.352***0.037***0.351***0.036    
Variance residual (AC)      0.452***0.0700.518***0.031
Variance intercept (EPMHRM0.274***0.0640.207***0.0760.207***0.0762.664***0.5560.502***0.031
Variance intercept (AC)          
Variance ES-R quality  0.0100.0080.0100.008    
Covariance (intercept * ES-R quality)  0.0280.044      
Model Variance−538.728−532.063−531.232   

Note(s): Nlevel-1 = 542, Nlevel-2 = 38; ICC of intercept only model (variance between/(variance between + variance within) = 0.274/(0.274 + 0.360) = 0.432 that is 43.2% of the variance in employees’ perception of motivation-enhancing HR practices resides between departments, supporting the use of MLM analysis. B coefficients are unstandardized. SE refers to standard errors. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options