Results of the multi-level model
| Dependent variable | EPMHRM | AC | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 – Intercept only | M1 – With predictors | M2 – With cross-level interaction | M3-mediation 1 | M4- mediation 2 | ||||||
| Fixed part | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE |
| Intercept | 3.785*** | 0.089 | 2.527*** | 0.585 | 2.612*** | 0.533 | 4.445 *** | 0.406 | 2.656*** | 0.187 |
| Gender (0 = male) | −0.031 | 0.051 | −0.032 | 0.051 | 0.149* | 0.064 | 0.041 | 0.064 | ||
| Yrs. of experience in dept. | 0.030 | 0.043 | 0.030 | 0.044 | 0.148* | 0.061 | 0.099* | 0.049 | ||
| ES-R quality | 0.337*** | 0.031 | 0.249*** | 0.035 | ||||||
| EPMHRM | 0.332*** | 0.065 | 0.254*** | 0.044 | ||||||
| SPMHRM | 0.298* | 0.134 | 0.278* | 0.118 | 0.050 | 0.084 | ||||
| SPMHRM (indirect effect via EPMHRM) | 0.093* | 0.045 | ||||||||
| ES-R quality (Indirect effect via EPMHRM) | 0.086*** | 0.017 | ||||||||
| ES-R quality * SPMHRM | 0.057 | 0.048 | ||||||||
| Random part | ||||||||||
| Variance residual (EPMHRM | 0.360*** | 0.040 | 0.352*** | 0.037*** | 0.351*** | 0.036 | ||||
| Variance residual (AC) | 0.452*** | 0.070 | 0.518*** | 0.031 | ||||||
| Variance intercept (EPMHRM | 0.274*** | 0.064 | 0.207*** | 0.076 | 0.207*** | 0.076 | 2.664*** | 0.556 | 0.502*** | 0.031 |
| Variance intercept (AC) | ||||||||||
| Variance ES-R quality | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.010 | 0.008 | ||||||
| Covariance (intercept * ES-R quality) | 0.028 | 0.044 | ||||||||
| Model Variance | −538.728 | −532.063 | −531.232 | |||||||
| Dependent variable | EPMHRM | AC | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 – Intercept only | M1 – With predictors | M2 – With cross-level interaction | M3-mediation 1 | M4- mediation 2 | ||||||
| Fixed part | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE |
| Intercept | 3.785*** | 0.089 | 2.527*** | 0.585 | 2.612*** | 0.533 | 4.445 *** | 0.406 | 2.656*** | 0.187 |
| Gender (0 = male) | −0.031 | 0.051 | −0.032 | 0.051 | 0.149* | 0.064 | 0.041 | 0.064 | ||
| Yrs. of experience in dept. | 0.030 | 0.043 | 0.030 | 0.044 | 0.148* | 0.061 | 0.099* | 0.049 | ||
| ES-R quality | 0.337*** | 0.031 | 0.249*** | 0.035 | ||||||
| EPMHRM | 0.332*** | 0.065 | 0.254*** | 0.044 | ||||||
| SPMHRM | 0.298* | 0.134 | 0.278* | 0.118 | 0.050 | 0.084 | ||||
| SPMHRM (indirect effect via EPMHRM) | 0.093* | 0.045 | ||||||||
| ES-R quality (Indirect effect via EPMHRM) | 0.086*** | 0.017 | ||||||||
| ES-R quality * SPMHRM | 0.057 | 0.048 | ||||||||
| Variance residual (EPMHRM | 0.360*** | 0.040 | 0.352*** | 0.037*** | 0.351*** | 0.036 | ||||
| Variance residual (AC) | 0.452*** | 0.070 | 0.518*** | 0.031 | ||||||
| Variance intercept (EPMHRM | 0.274*** | 0.064 | 0.207*** | 0.076 | 0.207*** | 0.076 | 2.664*** | 0.556 | 0.502*** | 0.031 |
| Variance intercept (AC) | ||||||||||
| Variance ES-R quality | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.010 | 0.008 | ||||||
| Covariance (intercept * ES-R quality) | 0.028 | 0.044 | ||||||||
| Model Variance | −538.728 | −532.063 | −531.232 | |||||||
Note(s): Nlevel-1 = 542, Nlevel-2 = 38; ICC of intercept only model (variance between/(variance between + variance within) = 0.274/(0.274 + 0.360) = 0.432 that is 43.2% of the variance in employees’ perception of motivation-enhancing HR practices resides between departments, supporting the use of MLM analysis. B coefficients are unstandardized. SE refers to standard errors. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.