Table 1

Descriptive statistics for the major variables

VariablesHQS in the non-crisis timeHQS in the crisis time
Valid NMeanMinMaxStd.DevValid NMeanMinMaxStd.Dev
Results in finance2004.033.05.00.322003.923.05.00.36
Results in HRM2003.983.05.00.382003.923.05.00.37
Results in quality2003.853.05.00.602003.772.05.00.58
Results in innovativeness2003.772.05.00.572003.822.05.00.54
Employee performance in KPIs2003.002.04.00.492003.242.04.00.53
Advancement level of EB2003.532.004.000.512003.572.005.000.53
Significance level of EB2003.522.005.000.582003.692.005.000.48
VariablesForeign subsidiaries in the non-crisis timeForeign subsidiaries in the crisis time
Valid NMeanMinMaxStd.DevValid NMeanMinMaxStd.Dev
Results in finance2003.993.05.00.242003.933.05.00.37
Results in HRM2003.983.05.00.312003.923.05.00.34
Results in quality2003.812.05.00.572003.773.05.00.54
Results in innovativeness2003.812.05.00.562003.903.05.00.50
Employee performance in KPIs2003.052.04.00.392003.192.04.00.51
Advancement level of EB2003.332.005.000.502003.442.004.000.55
Significance level of EB2003.412.005.000.622003.662.005.000.54

Note(s): Scales, Company performance results in HRM, finance, innovativeness, quality → benchmarked to the companies of similar business profile: 1 – poor, 2 – below average, 3 – similar to others, 4 – above average, 5 – very good, Employee performance in KPIs: 1 – significantly below standards, 2 – rather below standards, 3 – exactly with the standards, 4 – rather higher than standards, 5 – significantly higher than standards, Advancement level of EB → benchmarked to the best market practices: 1 – significantly lower, 2 – lower, 3 – similar to others, 4 – higher, 5 – significantly higher, Significance level of EB to the company’s performance results: 1 – not important, 2 – slightly important, 3 – important, 4 – very important, 5 – of critical significance

Source(s): Own empirical research

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal