Table 2 The results of a correlation... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

The results of a correlation test for the major variables modified by the efficiency ratio (employee KPIs)

Variables	HQS in the NON-CRISIS time		HQS in the crisis time
Variables	Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	Advancement level of ED $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$	Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	Advancement level of ED $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$
1. Results in finance $(\frac{F}{E K P I s})$	0.91*	0.69*	0.89*	0.71*
2. Results in quality $(\frac{Q}{E K P I s})$	0.69*	0.58*	0.65*	0.56*
3. Results in innovativeness $(\frac{I}{E K P I s})$	0.76*	0.57*	0.80*	0.63*
4. Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	1.00	0.67*	1.00	0.70*
5. Advancement level of EB $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$	0.67*	1.00	0.70*	1.00

Variables	HQS in the NON-CRISIS time		HQS in the crisis time
Variables	Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	Advancement level of ED $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$	Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	Advancement level of ED $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$
1. Results in finance $(\frac{F}{E K P I s})$	0.91*	0.69*	0.89*	0.71*
2. Results in quality $(\frac{Q}{E K P I s})$	0.69*	0.58*	0.65*	0.56*
3. Results in innovativeness $(\frac{I}{E K P I s})$	0.76*	0.57*	0.80*	0.63*
4. Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	1.00	0.67*	1.00	0.70*
5. Advancement level of EB $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$	0.67*	1.00	0.70*	1.00

Variables	Foreign subsidiaries in the NON-CRISIS time		Foreign subsidiaries in the crisis time
Variables	Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	Advancement level of ED $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$	Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	Advancement level of ED $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$
1. Results in finance $(\frac{F}{E K P I s})$	0.90*	0.59*	0.87*	0.71*
2. Results in quality $(\frac{Q}{E K P I s})$	0.61*	0.45*	0.64*	0.60*
3. Results in innovativeness $(\frac{I}{E K P I s})$	0.68*	0.42*	0.84*	0.63*
4. Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	1.00	0.61*	1.00	0.71*
5. Advancement level of EB $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$	0.61*	1.00	0.71*	1.00

Variables	Foreign subsidiaries in the NON-CRISIS time		Foreign subsidiaries in the crisis time
Variables	Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	Advancement level of ED $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$	Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	Advancement level of ED $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$
1. Results in finance $(\frac{F}{E K P I s})$	0.90*	0.59*	0.87*	0.71*
2. Results in quality $(\frac{Q}{E K P I s})$	0.61*	0.45*	0.64*	0.60*
3. Results in innovativeness $(\frac{I}{E K P I s})$	0.68*	0.42*	0.84*	0.63*
4. Results in HRM $(\frac{H R M}{E K P I s})$	1.00	0.61*	1.00	0.71*
5. Advancement level of EB $(\frac{A L_E B}{E K P I s})$	0.61*	1.00	0.71*	1.00

Note(s):* Marked correlations are significant at p <00.010

Source(s): Own empirical research