Table 3

Path analysis summary in PLS-SEM for EB and company performance results in finance

HQS in the non-crisis timeHQS in the crisis time
Variables in pathsβZp95%CIR2Variables in pathsβZp95%CIR2
EB → Finance0.163.41<0.001[0.07; 0.24]0.83EB → Finance0.173.65<0.001[0.08; 0.26]0.81
EB → HRM (α)0.6711.93<0.001[0.56; 0.77]0.44EB → HRM (α)0.7013.69<0.001[0.60; 0.80]0.50
HRM → Finance0.8013.05<0.001[0.68; 0.92]HRM → Finance0.7712.98<0.001[0.66; 0.89]
Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)0.537.80<0.001[0.40; 0.67]Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)0.549.81<0.001[0.44; 0.65]
Foreign subsidiaries in the non-crisis timeForeign subsidiaries in the crisis time
Variables in pathsβZp95%CIR2Variables in pathsβZp95%CIR2
EB → Finance0.081.90>0.050.82EB → Finance0.203.94<0.001[0.10; 0.29]0.78
EB → HRM (α)0.618.27<0.001[0.46; 0.75]0.37EB → HRM (α)0.7111.36<0.001[0.58; 0.83]0.50
HRM → Finance0.8612.35<0.001[0.72; 0.99]HRM → Finance0.7310.67<0.001[0.60; 0.87]
Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)0.527.50<0.001[0.38; 0.65]Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)0.529.11<0.001[0.41; 0.63]

Note(s): All variables modified by the efficiency ratio (employee KPIs)

Source(s): Own empirical research

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal