Table 5 Path analysis summary in PLS-SEM... | Emerald Publishing

Table 5

Path analysis summary in PLS-SEM for EB and company performance results in quality

HQS in the non-crisis time						HQS in the crisis time
Variables in paths	β	Z	p	95%CI	R²	Variables in paths	β	Z	p	95%CI	R²
EB → Quality	0.22	3.14	p < 0.01	[0.08; 0.36]	0.50	EB → Quality	0.20	2.34	<0.05	[0.03; 0.37]	0.44
EB → HRM (α)	0.67	11.93	<0.001	[0.56; 0.77]	0.44	EB → HRM (α)	0.70	13.69	<0.001	[0.60; 0.80]	0.50
HRM → Quality	0.54	6.47	<0.001	[0.38; 0.70]	–	HRM → Quality	0.51	4.98	<0.001	[0.31; 0.70]	–
Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)	0.36	5.28	<0.001	[0.23; 0.49]	–	Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)	0.36	4.95	<0.001	[0.21; 0.50]	–

HQS in the non-crisis time						HQS in the crisis time
Variables in paths	β	Z	p	95%CI	R²	Variables in paths	β	Z	p	95%CI	R²
EB → Quality	0.22	3.14	p < 0.01	[0.08; 0.36]	0.50	EB → Quality	0.20	2.34	<0.05	[0.03; 0.37]	0.44
EB → HRM (α)	0.67	11.93	<0.001	[0.56; 0.77]	0.44	EB → HRM (α)	0.70	13.69	<0.001	[0.60; 0.80]	0.50
HRM → Quality	0.54	6.47	<0.001	[0.38; 0.70]	–	HRM → Quality	0.51	4.98	<0.001	[0.31; 0.70]	–
Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)	0.36	5.28	<0.001	[0.23; 0.49]	–	Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)	0.36	4.95	<0.001	[0.21; 0.50]	–

Foreign subsidiaries in the NON-CRISIS time						Foreign subsidiaries in the crisis time
Variables in paths	β	Z	p	95%CI	R²	Variables in paths	β	Z	p	95%CI	R²
EB → Quality	0.12	1.52	>0.05	–	0.38	EB → Quality	0.31	3.37	<0.001	[0.13; 0.49]	0.45
EB → HRM (α)	0.61	8.27	<0.001	[0.46; 0.75]	0.37	EB → HRM (α)	0.71	11.36	<0.001	[0.58; 0.83]	0.50
HRM → Quality	0.54	4.97	<0.001	[0.32; 0.75]	–	HRM → Quality	0.42	4.31	<0.001	[0.23; 0.61]	–
Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)	0.32	4.79	<0.001	[0.19; 0.46]	–	Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)	0.29	4.36	<0.001	[0.16; 0.43]	–

Foreign subsidiaries in the NON-CRISIS time						Foreign subsidiaries in the crisis time
Variables in paths	β	Z	p	95%CI	R²	Variables in paths	β	Z	p	95%CI	R²
EB → Quality	0.12	1.52	>0.05	–	0.38	EB → Quality	0.31	3.37	<0.001	[0.13; 0.49]	0.45
EB → HRM (α)	0.61	8.27	<0.001	[0.46; 0.75]	0.37	EB → HRM (α)	0.71	11.36	<0.001	[0.58; 0.83]	0.50
HRM → Quality	0.54	4.97	<0.001	[0.32; 0.75]	–	HRM → Quality	0.42	4.31	<0.001	[0.23; 0.61]	–
Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)	0.32	4.79	<0.001	[0.19; 0.46]	–	Mediation effect of HRM (αβ)	0.29	4.36	<0.001	[0.16; 0.43]	–

Note(s): All variables modified by the efficiency ratio (employee KPIs)

Source(s): Own empirical research