Table 4

Teacher perceptions of a proposed school-provided lunch program according to school characteristics (n = 337)

School typeRegionalitySEPSizeTotal
OutcomeGovNon-govMajor cityRegional cityLowMediumHighSmallMediumLarge
Primary schools should have a school-provided lunch program, n (%)
Yes80 (29.3)18 (29.6)64 (30.3)28 (28.6)36 (29.8)27 (26.7)28 (32.9)24 (31.2)9 (31.0)62 (28.7)99 (29.4)
Maybe/Unsure129 (47.3)25 (41.0)92 (43.6)44 (44.9)54 (44.6)50 (49.5)31 (36.5)32 (41.6)13 (44.8)100 (46.3)155 (46.0)
No64 (23.4)18 (29.5)55 (26.1)26 (26.5)31 (25.6)24 (23.8)26 (30.6)21 (27.3)7 (24.1)54 (25.0)83 (24.6)
Parent preferences for a school-provided lunch program, n (%)
Yes80 (29.4)18 (29.5)60 (28.6)31 (31.6)35 (28.9)30 (30.0)26 (30.6)26 (33.8)13 (44.8)55 (25.6)100 (29.8)
Maybe/Unsure163 (59.9)32 (52.5)124 (59.1)56 (57.1)72 (59.5)59 (59.0)47 (55.3)43 (55.8)13 (44.8)133 (61.9)196 (58.3)
No29 (10.7)11 (18.0)26 (12.4)11 (11.2)14 (11.6)11 (11.0)12 (14.2)8 (10.4)3 (10.3)27 (12.6)40 (11.9)
Funding responsibility for a school-provided lunch program*, n (%)
Government only97 (49.2)20 (48.8)78 (52.7)32 (47.8)45 (52.9)35 (49.3)30 (51.7)26 (51.0)8 (40.0)79 (51.0)118 (49.2)
Government and parents96 (48.7)14 (34.2)63 (42.6)32 (47.8)37 (43.5)32 (45.1)26 (44.8)22 (43.1)11 (55.0)69 (44.5)111 (46.3)
Parents only1 (0.5)4 (9.8)4 (2.7)0 (0.0)2 (2.4)1 (1.4)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)1 (5.0)4 (2.6)5 (2.1)
Other3 (1.5)3 (7.3)3 (2.0)3 (4.5)1 (1.2)3 (4.2)1 (1.7)3 (5.9)0 (0.0)3 (1.9)6 (2.5)
Perceived benefits of a school-provided lunch program*, n (%)
Children eating healthy food173 (87.4)38 (92.7)138 (92.6)60 (90.0)78 (90.7)66 (93.0)53 (91.4)45 (86.5)19 (95.0)139 (89.9)212 (88.0)
Convenience for parents141 (71.2)27 (65.9)107 (72.3)48 (70.6)60 (69.8)51 (71.8)44 (75.9)35 (67.3)16 (80.0)111 (71.6)170 (70.5)
Children eating a hot cooked meal132 (67.0)27 (67.5)104 (70.8)42 (62.7)57 (67.1)49 (69.0)39 (68.4)27 (54.0)17 (85.0)109 (70.3)161 (67.4)
Peer influence to try new foods124 (62.9)26 (63.4)98 (66.2)42 (62.7)53 (62.4)44 (62.0)43 (74.1)31 (60.8)14 (70.0)99 (63.9)151 (62.9)
Children eating new foods in a social setting121 (61.4)21 (51.22)86 (58.1)44 (65.7)52 (61.2)42 (59.2)36 (62.1)31 (60.8)16 (80.0)91 (58.7)143 (59.6)
Children eating the same food82 (41.8)11 (26.8)59 (39.9)28 (42.4)34 (40.0)27 (38.6)25 (43.1)20 (40.0)9 (45.0)61 (39.4)95 (39.8)
Children having more time to eat lunch74 (37.6)10 (24.4)51 (34.5)25 (37.3)35 (41.2)22 (31.0)19 (32.8)14 (27.5)9 (45.0)54 (34.8)84 (35.0)
Perceived barriers of a school-provided lunch program, n (%)
Cost to parents215 (78.8)48 (78.7)176 (83.4)76 (77.6)100 (82.6)83 (82.2)68 (80.0)55 (71.4)27 (93.1)177 (81.9)265 (78.6)
Lack of teacher support for serving food193 (70.7)49 (80.3)152 (72.0)80 (81.6)95 (78.5)74 (73.3)63 (74.1)55 (71.4)21 (72.4)163 (75.5)244 (72.4)
Time to serve food182 (66.7)50 (82.0)151 (71.6)67 (68.4)84 (69.4)74 (73.3)60 (70.6)44 (57.1)23 (79.3)158 (73.2)233 (69.1)
Food waste163 (59.7)43 (70.5)130 (61.6)63 (64.3)78 (64.5)55 (54.5)58 (68.2)42 (54.6)20 (69.0)140 (64.8)208 (61.7)
Child fussiness147 (53.9)34 (55.7)115 (54.5)57 (58.2)67 (55.4)59 (58.4)45 (52.9)47 (61.0)12 (41.4)115 (53.2)183 (54.3)
Inadequate space142 (52.0)33 (54.1)118 (55.9)48 (49.0)61 (50.4)62 (61.4)42 (49.4)28 (36.4)16 (55.2)131 (60.7)176 (52.2)
Reduced teaching time134 (49.1)22 (36.1)101 (47.9)44 (44.9)55 (45.5)56 (55.5)34 (40.0)28 (36.4)13 (44.8)114 (52.8)158 (46.9)
Children’s dietary requirements125 (45.8)32 (52.5)114 (54.0)35 (35.7)53 (43.8)41 (40.6)54 (63.5)24 (31.2)12 (41.4)117 (54.2)159 (47.2)
Parents wanting to know what children are eating110 (40.3)28 (45.9)96 (45.5)34 (34.7)45 (37.2)40 (39.6)44 (51.8)22 (28.6)14 (48.3)100 (46.3)140 (41.5)
Lack of teacher support for supervising children105 (38.5)31 (50.8)89 (42.2)42 (42.9)46 (38.0)45 (44.6)40 (47.1)32 (41.6)12 (41.4)90 (41.7)138 (41.0)
Allergies93 (34.1)24 (39.3)89 (42.2)23 (23.5)42 (34.7)31 (30.7)38 (44.7)16 (20.8)9 (31.0)92 (42.6)118 (35.0)
Equipment needs84 (30.8)22 (36.1)66 (31.3)33 (33.7)38 (31.4)31 (30.7)30 (35.3)24 (31.2)10 (34.5)67 (31.0)106 (31.5)
Parent concerns about quality77 (28.2)20 (32.8)71 (33.7)19 (19.4)32 (26.5)19 (18.8)37 (43.5)16 (20.8)10 (34.5)69 (31.9)99 (29.4)
Cost to taxpayers77 (28.2)17 (27.9)64 (30.3)28 (28.6)39 (32.2)28 (27.7)25 (29.4)17 (22.1)2 (6.9)72 (33.3)96 (28.5)
Teacher concerns about quality71 (26.0)10 (16.4)59 (28.0)16 (16.3)28 (23.1)17 (16.8)30 (35.3)10 (13.0)5 (27.6)60 (27.8)83 (24.6)
Mess43 (15.8)12 (19.7)37 (17.5)16 (16.3)22 (18.2)12 (11.9)19 (22.4)11 (14.3)5 (17.2)37 (17.1)56 (16.6)
Lack of parent trust39 (14.3)11 (18.0)34 (16.1)11 (11.2)17 (14.0)7 (6.9)21 (24.7)7 (9.1)2 (6.9)40 (18.5)51 (15.1)
Perceived enablers of a school-provided lunch program, n (%)
Funding230 (84.3)49 (80.3)177 (83.9)86 (87.8)111 (91.7)84 (83.2)66 (77.7)69 (89.6)25 (86.2)178 (82.4)281 (83.4)
Resources (e.g. kitchen equipment)214 (78.4)46 (75.4)165 (78.2)78 (79.6)97 (80.2)81 (80.2)63 (74.1)60 (77.9)25 (86.2)167 (77.3)262 (77.7)
School facilities (e.g. eating area)211 (77.3)44 (72.1)162 (76.8)78 (79.6)91 (75.2)81 (80.2)66 (77.7)55 (71.4)26 (89.7)168 (77.8)258 (76.6)
Parent awareness169 (61.9)30 (49.2)130 (61.6)56 (57.1)74 (61.2)57 (56.4)54 (63.5)40 (52.0)18 (62.1)135 (62.5)202 (59.9)

Note(s): *Question asked to 240 teachers who responded “yes” (n = 99) or “maybe” (n = 141) to the question Should all primary schools have a school-provided lunch program?

Gov = Government school

Non-gov = Non-government school

SEP = Socioeconomic position

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options