Table 1

Paper count per item of the MERSQI tool (Adapted from Reed et al., 2007b)

DomainMERSQI itemPoints per itemPaper count per item n = 72
Study design1. Study designSingle group cross-sectional or single group posttest only132
Single group pretest and posttest1.511
Nonrandomized, 2 group221
Randomized controlled trial37
Sampling2. No. of institutions10.556
211
>21.515
3. Response rate in %not applicable 4
<50 or not reported0.524
50–74114
>751.530
Type of data4. Type of dataAssessment by study participant137
Objective measurement335
Validity of evaluation instruments5. Internal structurenot applicable 2
not reported023
Reported147
6. Contentnot applicable 1
not reported07
Reported164
7. Relationships to other variablesnot applicable 1
not reported051
Reported120
Data analysis8. Appropriateness of analysisData analysis inappropriate for study design or type of data07
Data analysis appropriate for study design and type of data165
9. Complexity of analysisDescriptive analysis only134
Beyond descriptive analysis238
Outcomes10. OutcomesSatisfaction, attitudes, perceptions, opinions and general facts121
Knowledge, skills1.513
Behaviors211
Labor market outcome327
  Maximum total points18Point Average: 11.5

Note(s): Adapted from “Association between funding and quality of published medical education research,” by Reed et al. (2007b) 

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options