Table 4 DW mediating the relationship...

Table 4

DW mediating the relationship between TBJA and WE result

Relationship	Coeff.	SE	T-statistic	p-value	95% LCI	95% UCI
TBJA→WE	−0.20	0.09	−2.16	p < 0.05	0.02	0.38
TBJA→DW	0.75	0.06	12.75	p < 0.01	0.63	0.86
TBJA→DW→WE	0.15	0.07	1.99	p < 0.05	0.01	0.29
Effects
Direct	−0.20	0.09	2.16	p < 0.05	0.02	0.38
Indirect	−0.11	0.06			−0.23	0.01
Total	−0.31	0.15	2.07	p < 0.05	−0.42	−0.08

Relationship	Coeff.	SE	T-statistic	p-value	95% LCI	95% UCI
TBJA→WE	−0.20	0.09	−2.16	p < 0.05	0.02	0.38
TBJA→DW	0.75	0.06	12.75	p < 0.01	0.63	0.86
TBJA→DW→WE	0.15	0.07	1.99	p < 0.05	0.01	0.29
Effects
Direct	−0.20	0.09	2.16	p < 0.05	0.02	0.38
Indirect	−0.11	0.06			−0.23	0.01
Total	−0.31	0.15	2.07	p < 0.05	−0.42	−0.08

Note(s): DW – Decent Work; Technology-Based Job Autonomy – TJBA; Technology-Based Job Overload – TJBO; Technology-Based Job Monitoring – TJBM; Work Engagement – WE; Job Satisfaction - JS

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable