Table 6 Relationships among... | Emerald Publishing

Table 6

Relationships among Technology-based Job Monitoring (TBJM), Work Engagement (WE), Decent Work (DW), and Job Satisfaction (JS) results

Relationship	Coeff.	SE	T-statistic	p-value	95% LCI	95% UCI
TBJM → WE	0.39	0.06	6.67	p < 0.001	0.27	0.50
TBJM → DW	−0.01	0.05	−0.21	p > 0.05	−0.11	0.09
TBJM → DW → WE	−0.10	0.07	−1.46	p > 0.05	−0.23	0.03
DW → WE	−0.10	0.07	−1.44	p > 0.05	−0.25	0.04
WE → JS	0.68	0.03	21.57	p < 0.001	0.62	0.74
Effects
Direct	0.39	0.06	6.67	p < 0.001	0.27	0.50
Indirect	0.01	0.01			−0.01	0.01
Total	0.40	0.06	6.67	p < 0.001	0.27	0.50

Relationship	Coeff.	SE	T-statistic	p-value	95% LCI	95% UCI
TBJM → WE	0.39	0.06	6.67	p < 0.001	0.27	0.50
TBJM → DW	−0.01	0.05	−0.21	p > 0.05	−0.11	0.09
TBJM → DW → WE	−0.10	0.07	−1.46	p > 0.05	−0.23	0.03
DW → WE	−0.10	0.07	−1.44	p > 0.05	−0.25	0.04
WE → JS	0.68	0.03	21.57	p < 0.001	0.62	0.74
Effects
Direct	0.39	0.06	6.67	p < 0.001	0.27	0.50
Indirect	0.01	0.01			−0.01	0.01
Total	0.40	0.06	6.67	p < 0.001	0.27	0.50

Note(s): DW – Decent Work; Technology-Based Job Autonomy – TJBA; Technology-Based Job Overload – TJBO; Technology-Based Job Monitoring – TJBM; Work Engagement – WE; Job Satisfaction – JS

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable