Table 4 Test results on the hypotheses...

Table 4

Test results on the hypotheses

Relationship	Standardized regression coef.	p-value	Localized effect size (f²)
H1: FT→FC	0.105	0.003	0.032
H2: FS→FC	0.174	0.001	0.053
H3: EFFQP→FC	0.078	0.056	0.011
H4: FT→PFR	0.004	0.466	0.000
H5: FS→PFR	0.419	0.000	0.190
H6: EFFQP→PFR	0.307	0.000	0.111
H7: FC→PFR	0.127	0.079	0.010
H8a: FC→ES	0.240	0.003	0.025
H8b: FC→SS	0.281	0.003	0.030
H8c: FC→EnvS	0.162	0.083	0.011
H9a: PFR→ES	0.378	0.000	0.155
H9b: PFR→SS	0.506	0.000	0.246
H9c: PFR→EnvS	0.186	0.000	0.038

Relationship	Standardized regression coef.	p-value	Localizedeffect size (f²)
H1: FT→FC	0.105	0.003	0.032
H2: FS→FC	0.174	0.001	0.053
H3: EFFQP→FC	0.078	0.056	0.011
H4: FT→PFR	0.004	0.466	0.000
H5: FS→PFR	0.419	0.000	0.190
H6: EFFQP→PFR	0.307	0.000	0.111
H7: FC→PFR	0.127	0.079	0.010
H8a: FC→ES	0.240	0.003	0.025
H8b: FC→SS	0.281	0.003	0.030
H8c: FC→EnvS	0.162	0.083	0.011
H9a: PFR→ES	0.378	0.000	0.155
H9b: PFR→SS	0.506	0.000	0.246
H9c: PFR→EnvS	0.186	0.000	0.038

Note(s): (1). Based on the guidelines of Cohen (1992), f² = 0.02 is a small effect; f² = 0.15 is a medium effect; f² = 0.35 is a large effect (anything in between can be interpreted using these signposts); (2). p-values reported are based on the bootstrapping technique (for details, see Hair et al. (2022))

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable