Test results on the hypotheses
| Relationship | Standardized regression coef. | p-value | Localized effect size (f2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1: FT→FC | 0.105 | 0.003 | 0.032 |
| H2: FS→FC | 0.174 | 0.001 | 0.053 |
| H3: EFFQP→FC | 0.078 | 0.056 | 0.011 |
| H4: FT→PFR | 0.004 | 0.466 | 0.000 |
| H5: FS→PFR | 0.419 | 0.000 | 0.190 |
| H6: EFFQP→PFR | 0.307 | 0.000 | 0.111 |
| H7: FC→PFR | 0.127 | 0.079 | 0.010 |
| H8a: FC→ES | 0.240 | 0.003 | 0.025 |
| H8b: FC→SS | 0.281 | 0.003 | 0.030 |
| H8c: FC→EnvS | 0.162 | 0.083 | 0.011 |
| H9a: PFR→ES | 0.378 | 0.000 | 0.155 |
| H9b: PFR→SS | 0.506 | 0.000 | 0.246 |
| H9c: PFR→EnvS | 0.186 | 0.000 | 0.038 |
| Relationship | Standardized regression coef. | Localized | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.105 | 0.003 | 0.032 | |
| 0.174 | 0.001 | 0.053 | |
| 0.078 | 0.056 | 0.011 | |
| 0.004 | 0.466 | 0.000 | |
| 0.419 | 0.000 | 0.190 | |
| 0.307 | 0.000 | 0.111 | |
| 0.127 | 0.079 | 0.010 | |
| 0.240 | 0.003 | 0.025 | |
| 0.281 | 0.003 | 0.030 | |
| 0.162 | 0.083 | 0.011 | |
| 0.378 | 0.000 | 0.155 | |
| 0.506 | 0.000 | 0.246 | |
| 0.186 | 0.000 | 0.038 |
Note(s): (1). Based on the guidelines of Cohen (1992), f2 = 0.02 is a small effect; f2 = 0.15 is a medium effect; f2 = 0.35 is a large effect (anything in between can be interpreted using these signposts); (2). p-values reported are based on the bootstrapping technique (for details, see Hair et al. (2022))