Table 1

Sample of parcel locker literature

ArticleLocation (context)MethodFocusOutcomeAssumptions about the networkAssumptions about consumers
Weltevreden (2008) NetherlandsSurveyConsumer AdoptionConsumer use of attended service pointsExisting locker network (the Netherlands)Respondents shop online
Oliveira et al. (2017) BrazilStated Choice ExperimentConsumer AdoptionPreference for Automatic Delivery StationsPotential locker network characteristicsResidents of Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Deutsch and Golany (2018)  SurveyConsumer AdoptionCustomer intent to use parcel lockersExisting networkPrior online shopping experience
Wang et al. (2019) SingaporeSurveyConsumer AdoptionCustomer satisfaction  
Yuen et al. (2019) ChinaSurveyConsumer AdoptionIntent to use Lockers Smart locker users
Tsai and Tiwasing (2021) ThailandSurveyConsumer AdoptionCustomer attitude and intent to use lockers Thai citizens with online shopping experience
Merkert et al. (2022) AustraliaStated Choice ExperimentConsumer AdoptionConsumer Decision to use LockerPotential locker network characteristicsRespondents used home delivery in prior 12 months
Edwards et al. (2010) United KingdomCase StudyLocker NetworkCarbon EmissionsRoutes are set at 120 deliveries and 50 milesCombined collection and other activities
Lachapelle et al. (2018) AustraliaCase StudyLocker NetworkLocker network descriptionExisting locker network (Sydney, Australia) 
Veenstra et al. (2018) NetherlandsLocation and Routing ProblemLocker NetworkTravel costs consumer
Facility costs
Random locker locationsTravel distance limit
Hong et al. (2019) Created InstancesTraveling Salesman ProblemLocker NetworkDistance (Cost)Random locker locationsLocker delivery only
Travel distance limit
Ji et al. (2019) Created InstancesLocation Assignment ProblemLocker NetworkTotal cost (locker purchase and rental costs)Total energy consumptionRandom locker locations
Time windows
Randomly generated demand
Jiang et al. (2019) ChinaTraveling Salesman ProblemLocker NetworkTotal cost (delivery, pickup and locker opening cost)Random locker locationsLocker delivery vs. store pickup
Ulmer and Streng (2019) GermanyLocation and Delivery ProblemLocker NetworkTotal delivery timeRandom locker locationsLocker delivery only
Travel time limit
Schwerdfeger and Boysen (2020) NoneFacility Location ProblemLocker NetworkTotal ProfitRandom mobile locker locationsLocker delivery only
Travel distance limit
Peppel and Spinler (2022) “European Country”Network OptimizationLocker NetworkEconomic and Environmental CostRandom locker locationsActual demand data
Locker vs. home delivery
Travel distance limit
Seghezzi et al. (2022) ItalySimulationLocker NetworkAverage cost per deliveryRandom locker locationsRandomly generated demand
Leung et al. (2023) ChinaSimulationLocker NetworkCustomer delivery time
Route distance
Random locker locationsRandomly generated demand
Mohri et al. (2024) AustraliaSimulationLocker NetworkOperational CostExisting locker network (Melbourne, Australia)Demand based on market observations
Peppel et al. (2024) GlobalLocation Routing ProblemLocker NetworkEconomic and Environmental CostExisting locker network (15 global cities)Actual demand data
Locker vs. home delivery
Travel distance limit

Source(s): Table created by authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options