Inclusion criteria for research
| Inclusion criteria | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Research published anytime | Allows a large knowledge and evidence pool from peer-reviewed sources required to answer our research question. Time limits in the search and selection may cause selection bias Durach et al. (2017) |
| Research in the English language | The English language is the common language of the research team and is largely used in the research topic field Seuring and Gold (2012) |
| Peer-reviewed studies published in a journal | Peer-reviewed articles published in journals are considered to be of high quality compared to articles that are not peer-reviewed. Hence, conference proceedings, books, book chapters, and editorials were excluded |
| SCI studies that are policy-oriented | To gather relevant evidence to explain how government buyers regulate and stimulate SCI Wang et al. (2023) |
| Public procurement and policy research that aims to drive market/SCI | To gather relevant evidence to explain the procurement policy dynamics for promoting innovation in markets and industries through demand. Focuses on SCI driven from the demand side and downstream oriented |
| SCI studies that discuss supply network elements as an enabler | Gather evidence to explain how government agencies may regulate supply network activities to drive SCI |
| Include articles irrespective of their methods, theory, context, etc. | Aims to minimise selection bias Durach et al. (2017) |
| Inclusion criteria | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Research published anytime | Allows a large knowledge and evidence pool from peer-reviewed sources required to answer our research question. Time limits in the search and selection may cause selection bias |
| Research in the English language | The English language is the common language of the research team and is largely used in the research topic field |
| Peer-reviewed studies published in a journal | Peer-reviewed articles published in journals are considered to be of high quality compared to articles that are not peer-reviewed. Hence, conference proceedings, books, book chapters, and editorials were excluded |
| SCI studies that are policy-oriented | To gather relevant evidence to explain how government buyers regulate and stimulate SCI |
| Public procurement and policy research that aims to drive market/SCI | To gather relevant evidence to explain the procurement policy dynamics for promoting innovation in markets and industries through demand. Focuses on SCI driven from the demand side and downstream oriented |
| SCI studies that discuss supply network elements as an enabler | Gather evidence to explain how government agencies may regulate supply network activities to drive SCI |
| Include articles irrespective of their methods, theory, context, etc. | Aims to minimise selection bias |
Source(s): Authors’ construct and based on previous works Durach et al. (2017); Seuring and Gold (2012)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.