Table 5

BGD, critical mass, and women’s presence in TMT

DV = WOMMCDUMDV = WOMMC
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
1WOMAN−0.189  −0.019*  
(−0.57)  (−1.77)  
2WOMEN −0.438  −0.023** 
 (−1.46)  (−2.13) 
≥3WOMEN  1.380***  0.060***
  (4.03)  (4.31)
LNBSIZE−0.238−0.055−0.705−0.0110.004−0.025
(−0.54)(−0.14)(−1.61)(−0.62)(0.23)(−1.42)
BINDP1.8172.1471.527−0.083−0.061−0.094
(1.16)(1.34)(0.86)(−1.36)(−1.00)(−1.47)
FSIZE−0.295−0.323−0.271−0.007−0.006−0.003
(−0.86)(−0.95)(−0.77)(−0.76)(−0.71)(−0.29)
ROA−0.125−0.3480.6160.0160.0010.035
(−0.08)(−0.23)(0.38)(0.27)(0.02)(0.66)
LEV0.073*0.063*0.085**0.007***0.006***0.007***
(1.93)(1.68)(2.18)(3.09)(2.75)(3.28)
LFAGE−0.757***−0.756***−0.921***−0.029**−0.028**−0.034***
(−2.61)(−2.76)(−3.31)(−2.39)(−2.43)(−2.97)
Intercept4.0134.0014.7360.239**0.198**0.224**
(1.11)(1.11)(1.26)(2.34)(1.99)(2.21)
Year FEYesYesYesYesYesYes
Industry FEYesYesYesYesYesYes
Observations341341341390390390
Adjusted/Pseudo R20.1050.1090.1470.1470.1500.199

Note(s): This table reports the regression results of the association between BGENDIV and women’s presence in the TMT highlighting the role of critical mass. The t-statistics reported in parentheses are based on robust standard errors. Superscripts ***, **, and * denote significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. The definitions of variables are given in  Appendix

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options