Results of Delphi rounds 2 and 3 in relation to strategic barriers
| Strategic barrier | Participant agreement (%) | Consensus |
|---|---|---|
| Deficient leadership | 90.00% in round 2 | ✓ |
| Lack of top management support | 83.33% in round 2 | ✓ |
| Misunderstanding of asset management by top management | 83.33% in round 2 | ✓ |
| Lack of clear guidelines and strategies | 80.00% in round 2 | ✓ |
| Lack of consistency of objectives | 88.46% in round 3 | ✓ |
| Lack of clear mission and vision | 76.92% in round 3 | - |
| Difficulties in defining responsibilities and accountabilities | 70.00% in round 3 | - |
| Strategic barrier | Participant agreement (%) | Consensus |
|---|---|---|
| Deficient leadership | 90.00% in round 2 | ✓ |
| Lack of top management support | 83.33% in round 2 | ✓ |
| Misunderstanding of asset management by top management | 83.33% in round 2 | ✓ |
| Lack of clear guidelines and strategies | 80.00% in round 2 | ✓ |
| Lack of consistency of objectives | 88.46% in round 3 | ✓ |
| Lack of clear mission and vision | 76.92% in round 3 | - |
| Difficulties in defining responsibilities and accountabilities | 70.00% in round 3 | - |
Note(s): Consensus for barrier inclusion was reached when ≥ 80% of participants rated the barrier as “very important” or “extremely important,” and the IQR was ≤ 1. No consensus for inclusion occurred when > 20% but < 80% of participants rated the barrier as “very important” or “extremely important.”