Table 2 SEM results Hypotheses Path Path... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

SEM results

Hypotheses	Path	Path coefficient	St.Error	Z-value	p-value	Remarks
(A) Structural equation modeling results of the structural model
H1	PEOU → PU	0.042	0.068	0.620	0.538	Not supported
H2	PU→ATT	0.332	0.041	8.138	0.000^***	Supported
H3	PEOU→ATT	0.108	0.034	3,152	0.002^***	Supported
H4	PEOU→PE	0.367	0.043	8.510	0.000^***	Supported
H5	PU →PE	0.598	0.040	15.145	0.000^***	Supported
Mediating effect
H6	PU, PEOU →PE →ATT	0.461	0.046	9.915	0.000^***	Supported
Exogeneous effect
H7	PEBs → PEOU	0.379	0.054	6.962	0.000^***	Supported
H8	PEBs → PU	0.479	0.065	7.415	0.000^***	Supported
H9	PersInn → PEOU	0.440	0.055	7,934	0.000^***	Supported
H10	PersInn → PU	0.304	0.063	4.849	0.000^***	Supported
H11	ATT → BI	0.914	0.049	18.528	0.000^***	Supported

Hypotheses	Path	Path coefficient	St.Error	Z-value	p-value	Remarks
(A) Structural equation modeling results of the structural model
H1	PEOU → PU	0.042	0.068	0.620	0.538	Not supported
H2	PU→ATT	0.332	0.041	8.138	0.000^***	Supported
H3	PEOU→ATT	0.108	0.034	3,152	0.002^***	Supported
H4	PEOU→PE	0.367	0.043	8.510	0.000^***	Supported
H5	PU →PE	0.598	0.040	15.145	0.000^***	Supported
Mediating effect
H6	PU, PEOU →PE →ATT	0.461	0.046	9.915	0.000^***	Supported
Exogeneous effect
H7	PEBs → PEOU	0.379	0.054	6.962	0.000^***	Supported
H8	PEBs → PU	0.479	0.065	7.415	0.000^***	Supported
H9	PersInn → PEOU	0.440	0.055	7,934	0.000^***	Supported
H10	PersInn → PU	0.304	0.063	4.849	0.000^***	Supported
H11	ATT → BI	0.914	0.049	18.528	0.000^***	Supported

Independent variables	Total effects	Indirect	Direct	Result
(B) Mediating impact of perceived enjoyment
Perceived ease of use	0.276^***	0.169^***	0.108^***	Comp
Perceived usefulness	0.608^***	0.276^***	0.332^***	Comp

Note(s): ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.010, ^***p < 0.001, Comp = complementary mediation

Source(s): Authors’ own work