Table 9 Test for potential common method...

Table 9

Test for potential common method variance

Partialling out of a marker variable technique
Path	Path coefficient		Change	Construct	R² original	R² with marker	Change
Path	Original	With marker	Change	CEI	0.589	0.590	−0.001
CEI → PurInt	0.773	0.770	0.003	INFEXP	1.000	1.000	0.000
CEI → RecAdo	0.779	0.779	0.000	PurInt	0.598	0.600	−0.002
CEI → ShaInt	0.808	0.804	0.004	RecAdo	0.607	0.607	0.000
INFEXP → CEI	0.768	0.766	0.002	ShaInt	0.653	0.655	−0.002

Partialling out of a marker variable technique
Path	Path coefficient		Change	Construct	R² original	R² with marker	Change
Path	Original	With marker	Change	CEI	0.589	0.590	−0.001
CEI → PurInt	0.773	0.770	0.003	INFEXP	1.000	1.000	0.000
CEI → RecAdo	0.779	0.779	0.000	PurInt	0.598	0.600	−0.002
CEI → ShaInt	0.808	0.804	0.004	RecAdo	0.607	0.607	0.000
INFEXP → CEI	0.768	0.766	0.002	ShaInt	0.653	0.655	−0.002

Partialling of a marker variable technique
Variable pair	Correlation coefficient	t-statistic	p-values
INFEXP–CMVMarker	0.065	1.371	0.085
CEI–CMVMarker	0.080	1.773	0.038
PurInt–CMVMarker	0.105	2.200	0.014
RecAdo–CMVMarker	0.062	1.322	0.093
ShaInt–CMVMarker	0.113	2.398	0.008

Partialling of a marker variable technique
Variable pair	Correlation coefficient	t-statistic	p-values
INFEXP–CMVMarker	0.065	1.371	0.085
CEI–CMVMarker	0.080	1.773	0.038
PurInt–CMVMarker	0.105	2.200	0.014
RecAdo–CMVMarker	0.062	1.322	0.093
ShaInt–CMVMarker	0.113	2.398	0.008

Note(s): For SmartPLS, weighting scheme = factor, iteration = 1,000, complete bootstrapping with 5,000 bootstrapping samples, test type = two-tailed. INFEXP = Influencer experience, CEI = continued engagement intention, PurInt = purchase intention, RecAdo = adoption of SMI recommendation, ShaInt = sharing intention, CMVMarker = the marker variable (socially desirable responding)

Source(s): Authors' own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable