Table 3

Multilevel results towards leader outcomes (self-rated) – study 1 (Pakistan) and study 2 (New Zealand)

Study 1 leader outcomes (self-rated)Study 2 leader outcomes (self-rated)
Direct effects model to PA (L)Direct effects model to NA (L)Direct effects model to social mindfulness (L)Direct effects model to PA (L)Direct effects model to NA (L)Direct effects model to social mindfulness (L)
βSEβSEβSEβSEβSEβSE
Intercept4.407‡0.041.862‡0.044.055‡0.044.200‡0.021.571‡0.024.054‡0.02
Age (F)0.010.03−0.020.03−0.010.030.010.03−0.07**0.03−0.060.03
Age (L)−0.030.04−0.17‡0.04−0.010.040.09‡0.03−0.020.030.010.03
Team size (L)0.020.04−0.29‡0.040.000.04−0.020.02−0.07‡0.02−0.010.02
Emotional acting (F)0.000.04−0.030.04−0.05*0.040.050.04−0.050.040.000.04
PA (F)0.48‡0.06−0.38‡0.060.50‡0.060.35‡0.05−0.13**0.060.12*0.05
NA (F)−0.16**0.060.28‡0.05−0.30‡0.06−0.090.060.040.07−0.16‡0.06
Variance level 1 (F)0.44‡0.030.40‡0.030.45‡0.040.11‡0.010.12‡0.010.11‡0.01
−2 Log likelihood663.033629.826676.113147.450165.028132.078

Note(s): *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001. (L) = Leader, (F) = Followers. SE = standard estimate

Study 1: N = 330 followers and 106 leaders, Study 2: N = 226 followers and 73 leaders

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal