Table 4

Multilevel results towards leader support – study 1 (Pakistan)

Leader support (follower-rated)
Null
Model
Control
Model
Direct effects
Model (F)
Mediators
Model 1 (L)
Mediators
Model 2 (L)
Mediators
Model 3 (L)
βSEβSEβSEβSEβSEβSE
Intercept4.102‡0.074.1030.064.101‡0.034.103‡0.034.102‡0.034.103‡0.03
Age (F)  −0.040.03−0.010.02−0.010.02−0.010.02−0.010.02
Age (L)  −0.12*0.06−0.010.03−0.020.03−0.010.03−0.020.03
Team size (L)  0.080.060.010.030.020.040.000.030.030.04
Emotional acting (F)  −0.32‡0.03−0.06*0.03−0.06*0.03−0.05*0.03−0.05*0.03
PA (F)    0.53‡0.040.48‡0.050.50‡0.040.48‡0.05
NA (F)    −0.32‡0.04−0.31‡0.04−0.30‡0.04−0.31‡0.04
PA (L)      0.19‡0.05  0.17**0.06
NA (L)      0.070.05  0.080.05
Social mindfulness (L)        0.11**0.040.090.06
Variance level 2 (F)0.40‡ (57.8%)0.070.25‡0.050.04‡0.010.04‡0.010.04‡0.010.03**0.01
Variance level 1 (L)0.29‡ (42.2%)0.030.25‡0.020.16‡0.020.15‡0.020.14‡0.020.15‡0.02
−2 Log likelihood706.990625.346390.449375.049383.700374.331

Note(s): *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001. N = 330 followers and 106 leaders. (L) = Leader, (F)=Followers. SE = standard estimate

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal