Theoretical framework
| Sections of the framework | Guiding questions |
|---|---|
| Use of equity considerations in budget formulation and execution | To what extent have the reforms that incorporate social equity into public budgeting progressed beyond informal or nascent efforts to become comprehensive, deeply institutionalized practices across different phases of the budget cycle and government functions? |
| Political context | In the current political environment, is the political ideology of a jurisdiction sufficient to predict whether a government will undertake the implementation of equity-oriented budgetary reforms? |
| Economic context | Does a jurisdiction’s economic health enable more comprehensive and sustainable equity-oriented budgetary reforms, or does it simply provide a permissive environment for politically motivated, less-substantive initiatives? |
| Leadership | What specific qualities of leadership—such as transformational leadership or a commitment to transparency and accountability—are most critical in overcoming institutional inertia and political resistance to champion and sustain equity-oriented budgetary reforms? |
| Budget institutions | In what ways do strong budgetary institutions—such as the use of performance information and medium-term planning—provide a necessary technical and procedural foundation that allows equity-oriented reforms to be effectively embedded and measured? |
| Budgetary and financial transparency | Is the level of budgetary and financial transparency a direct catalyst for promoting equity in resource allocation? |
| Sections of the framework | Guiding questions |
|---|---|
| Use of equity considerations in budget formulation and execution | To what extent have the reforms that incorporate social equity into public budgeting progressed beyond informal or nascent efforts to become comprehensive, deeply institutionalized practices across different phases of the budget cycle and government functions? |
| Political context | In the current political environment, is the political ideology of a jurisdiction sufficient to predict whether a government will undertake the implementation of equity-oriented budgetary reforms? |
| Economic context | Does a jurisdiction’s economic health enable more comprehensive and sustainable equity-oriented budgetary reforms, or does it simply provide a permissive environment for politically motivated, less-substantive initiatives? |
| Leadership | What specific qualities of leadership—such as transformational leadership or a commitment to transparency and accountability—are most critical in overcoming institutional inertia and political resistance to champion and sustain equity-oriented budgetary reforms? |
| Budget institutions | In what ways do strong budgetary institutions—such as the use of performance information and medium-term planning—provide a necessary technical and procedural foundation that allows equity-oriented reforms to be effectively embedded and measured? |
| Budgetary and financial transparency | Is the level of budgetary and financial transparency a direct catalyst for promoting equity in resource allocation? |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.