Interconnectedness among the PV strategic dimensions, managing types and facilitating and hindering conditions
| Facilitating/hindering conditions by dimension | Facilitating/hindering conditions and managing types | Managing type by dimension | ||||
| Dimension | Facilitating | Hindering | Primarily type | Secondary type | ||
| Legitimacy and support |
|
| Upwards | Aligns with governance, regulatory frameworks and political support |
| |
| Operational capacity |
|
| Inwards | Strengthens internal structures, expertise and collaboration |
| |
| PV creation |
|
| Outwards | Engages external stakeholders and communicates societal impact |
| |
| Facilitating/hindering conditions by dimension | Facilitating/hindering conditions and managing types | Managing type by dimension | ||||
| Dimension | Facilitating | Hindering | Primarily type | Secondary type | ||
| Legitimacy and support | Regulatory frameworks providing formal legitimacy Strong political commitment from governance Institutional alignment with national and supranational mandates on gender reporting Stakeholder engagement reinforcing transparency | A compliance-focused mindset limiting innovation and proactive engagement Weak external pressures for the voluntary and transformative adoption of GE practices Dependence on institutional governance for approval and momentum Ambiguities in systematic data collection | Aligns with governance, regulatory frameworks and political support | |||
| Operational capacity | Collaborative practices Experienced staff with prior GE initiative involvement Civil servants’ active engagement in data selection, definition of metrics and analysis An innovation-oriented organisational mindset supporting tailored practices | Fragmented data systems and inconsistencies in reporting across organisations Resistance to change from civil servants unfamiliar with GE goals or metrics Dependence on external staff for data extraction and processing | Strengthens internal structures, expertise and collaboration | |||
| PV creation | Transparency and open communication of results to external stakeholders Alignment with broad organisational and societal goals enhancing the initiative’s public relevance External validation through engagement with stakeholders | Gaps in gender-disaggregated data limiting the ability to demonstrate impact Ambiguities in leadership roles complicating external communication Difficulty measuring gender disparities because of inconsistent data | Engages external stakeholders and communicates societal impact | |||
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.