Table A2 OSMASEM results without...

Table A2

OSMASEM results without switching behavior

Parameters	K	N	Estimate	Standard error	z-value	p-value
Hypothesized paths
DS → SI	46	17,466	0.227	0.037	6.163	<0.001
SC → SI	74	25,779	−0.150	0.046	−3.257	<0.001
AA → SI	53	20,138	0.416	0.032	12.829	<0.001
Correlations
DS ↔ AA	18	7,477	0.271	0.046	5.886	<0.001
DS ↔ SC	30	10,913	0.029	0.053	0.553	0.580
AA ↔ SC	28	9,296	0.001	0.060	0.015	0.988

Parameters	K	N	Estimate	Standard error	z-value	p-value
Hypothesized paths
DS → SI	46	17,466	0.227	0.037	6.163	<0.001
SC → SI	74	25,779	−0.150	0.046	−3.257	<0.001
AA → SI	53	20,138	0.416	0.032	12.829	<0.001
Correlations
DS ↔ AA	18	7,477	0.271	0.046	5.886	<0.001
DS ↔ SC	30	10,913	0.029	0.053	0.553	0.580
AA ↔ SC	28	9,296	0.001	0.060	0.015	0.988

Note(s): R²_SI = 30%, k: Number of correlations per relation, N: Total number of respondents across k samples, DS: Dissatisfaction, SC: Switching Costs, AA: Alternative Attractiveness, SI: Switching Intention

Source(s): Author’s own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable