UTUAT systematization of theories and dimensions of technology adoption and use
| Theories before UTUAT | Dimensions before UTUAT | UTUAT systematization |
|---|---|---|
| Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) | Attitude toward using technology | Not included |
| Subjective norm | Social influence | |
| Technology acceptance model (TAM) - Technology acceptance model 2 (TAM2) | Perceived usefulness | Performance expectancy |
| Perceived ease of use | Effort expectancy | |
| Subjective norm | Social influence | |
| Motivational Model (MM) | Intrinsic motivation | Not included |
| Extrinsic motivation | Performance expectancy | |
| Theory of planned behavior (TPB) | Attitude toward using technology | Not included |
| Subjective norm | Social influence | |
| Perceived behavioral control | Facilitating conditions | |
| Combined TAM and TPB | Perceived usefulness | Performance expectancy |
| Attitude toward using technology | Not included | |
| Subjective norm | Social influence | |
| Model of PC utilization (MPCU) | Job-fit | Performance expectancy |
| Complexity | Effort expectancy | |
| Long-term consequences | Not included | |
| Affect toward use | Not included | |
| Social factors | Social influence | |
| Facilitating conditions | Facilitating conditions | |
| Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) | Relative advantage | Performance expectancy |
| Ease of use | Effort expectancy | |
| Result demonstrability | Not included | |
| Trialability | Not included | |
| Visibility | Not included | |
| Image | Social influence | |
| Compatibility | Facilitating conditions | |
| Voluntariness | Not included | |
| Socio-Cognitive Theory (SCT) | Outcome expectations | Performance expectancy |
| Self-efficacy | Not included | |
| Affect | Not included | |
| Anxiety | Not included |
| Theories before UTUAT | Dimensions before UTUAT | UTUAT systematization |
|---|---|---|
| Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) | Attitude toward using technology | Not included |
| Subjective norm | Social influence | |
| Technology acceptance model (TAM) - Technology acceptance model 2 (TAM2) | Perceived usefulness | Performance expectancy |
| Perceived ease of use | Effort expectancy | |
| Subjective norm | Social influence | |
| Motivational Model (MM) | Intrinsic motivation | Not included |
| Extrinsic motivation | Performance expectancy | |
| Theory of planned behavior (TPB) | Attitude toward using technology | Not included |
| Subjective norm | Social influence | |
| Perceived behavioral control | Facilitating conditions | |
| Combined TAM and TPB | Perceived usefulness | Performance expectancy |
| Attitude toward using technology | Not included | |
| Subjective norm | Social influence | |
| Model of PC utilization (MPCU) | Job-fit | Performance expectancy |
| Complexity | Effort expectancy | |
| Long-term consequences | Not included | |
| Affect toward use | Not included | |
| Social factors | Social influence | |
| Facilitating conditions | Facilitating conditions | |
| Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) | Relative advantage | Performance expectancy |
| Ease of use | Effort expectancy | |
| Result demonstrability | Not included | |
| Trialability | Not included | |
| Visibility | Not included | |
| Image | Social influence | |
| Compatibility | Facilitating conditions | |
| Voluntariness | Not included | |
| Socio-Cognitive Theory (SCT) | Outcome expectations | Performance expectancy |
| Self-efficacy | Not included | |
| Affect | Not included | |
| Anxiety | Not included |
Note(s): Not included: dimensions that do not increase the variance explained by the individual acceptance of technology
Source(s): Authors’ work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.