Table 3

Hierarchical regressions predicting cynicism, separately for bachelor’s degree and master’s degree

Bachelor’s degreeMaster’s degree
VariableβSEtR2R2adjβSEtR2R2adj
Step 0          
intercept1.560.0438.61***  1.890.0540.33***  
Step 1   0.330.32   0.350.34
intercept0.540.15.18***  0.50.133.94***  
Exhaustion0.060.061.14  0.090.061.45  
Inadequacy0.430.059.43***  0.490.059.43***  
Step 2   0.350.33   0.40.39
intercept1.260.373.43***  2.520.475.34***  
Exhaustion0.090.061.49  0.090.061.46  
Inadequacy0.370.057.37***  0.350.066.12***  
Organised studying−0.120.06−1.91  −0.120.07−1.77  
Deep approach−0.010.08−0.04  −0.110.09−1.26  
Unreflective learning0.050.07−1.21  0.050.070.75  
Self-efficacy−0.10.08−1.21  −0.30.1−3.08**  
Step 3   0.420.4   0.50.49
intercept1.850.394.75***  2.890.476.09***  
Exhaustion0.060.061.14  0.070.061.11  
Inadequacy0.360.057.36***  0.310.055.79***  
Organised studying−0.040.06−0.65  −0.040.07−0.56  
Deep approach0.150.081.81  0.10.081.17  
Unreflective learning−0.010.06−0.09  0.060.070.89  
Self-efficacy−0.070.08−0.84  −0.090.09−0.99  
Alignment0.120.081.57  0.10.081.22  
Feedback−0.040.06−0.59  −0.110.07−1.54  
Interest−0.390.07−5.16***  −0.510.08−6.37***  
Peer support−0.090.06−1.44  −0.090.06−1.43  

Note(s): *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal