Delphi initial items
| Category | Criteria | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier -related criteria | 1. Appearance, sincerity, and authenticity | The visual appeal and genuine nature of the SMI, including their personal style, authenticity in their content, and sincerity in their interactions |
| 2. Number of followers | The total count of individuals who follow the SMI’s social media accounts, indicating their reach and potential audience size | |
| 3. Past contents’ value and quality | Evaluates the quality, relevance, and value of the SMI’s previous content, including the relevance and usefulness of their posts | |
| 4. Frequency of posts | Considers the regularity and consistency with which the SMI publishes new content or engages with their audience through posts or other forms of communication | |
| 5. Affability and public relations | Focuses on the SMI’s ability to build positive relationships with their audience, establish trust, and effectively promote events through their public relations skills | |
| 6. Expertise/credibility | Reflects the SMI’s level of expertise/knowledge, academic/scientific position, and experience in a specific field, which contributes to their credibility as a reliable source of information | |
| 7. Connectedness and tangibles | Involves the SMI’s understanding of social media platforms, algorithms, and their ability to establish connections between users, events, and targeted user groups. Tangibles also refer to the physical and technological aids and resources they utilize in their posts | |
| 8. Target market alignment | Considers the alignment between the SMI’s target audience and the event’s target market, ensuring that their content will resonate with and attract the desired participant segment | |
| Service – related performance | 9. Reliability and trustworthiness | Assesses the SMI’s ability to consistently deliver on promises, fulfill obligations, and establish trust, influencing the audience’s intentions |
| 10. Participatory activities, engagement, and argument effort | Evaluates the SMI’s level of interaction and engagement with their audience, including their ability to create authentic connections, foster emotional attachment, and build trust through meaningful interactions. It also refers to the persuasiveness of the arguments included in the SMI’s post | |
| 11. Potential for quality presentation and empathy | Considers the SMI’s potential to effectively promote events and their ability to demonstrate empathy toward their audience, addressing their emotions appropriately | |
| 12. Success of past campaigns | Examines the SMI’s track record of successful past promotional campaigns, indicating their ability to generate positive results and drive desired outcomes | |
| 13. Assurance and quality communication | Focuses on the SMI’s proficiency in communicating the event with their followers, including their clarity of post details and ability to provide immediate feedback to inquiries | |
| Cost issues | 14. Payment and cost issues | Considers the financial aspect of collaborating with the SMI, including their fees and payment preference |
| Category | Criteria | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier -related criteria | 1. Appearance, sincerity, and authenticity | The visual appeal and genuine nature of the SMI, including their personal style, authenticity in their content, and sincerity in their interactions |
| 2. Number of followers | The total count of individuals who follow the SMI’s social media accounts, indicating their reach and potential audience size | |
| 3. Past contents’ value and quality | Evaluates the quality, relevance, and value of the SMI’s previous content, including the relevance and usefulness of their posts | |
| 4. Frequency of posts | Considers the regularity and consistency with which the SMI publishes new content or engages with their audience through posts or other forms of communication | |
| 5. Affability and public relations | Focuses on the SMI’s ability to build positive relationships with their audience, establish trust, and effectively promote events through their public relations skills | |
| 6. Expertise/credibility | Reflects the SMI’s level of expertise/knowledge, academic/scientific position, and experience in a specific field, which contributes to their credibility as a reliable source of information | |
| 7. Connectedness and tangibles | Involves the SMI’s understanding of social media platforms, algorithms, and their ability to establish connections between users, events, and targeted user groups. Tangibles also refer to the physical and technological aids and resources they utilize in their posts | |
| 8. Target market alignment | Considers the alignment between the SMI’s target audience and the event’s target market, ensuring that their content will resonate with and attract the desired participant segment | |
| Service – related performance | 9. Reliability and trustworthiness | Assesses the SMI’s ability to consistently deliver on promises, fulfill obligations, and establish trust, influencing the audience’s intentions |
| 10. Participatory activities, engagement, and argument effort | Evaluates the SMI’s level of interaction and engagement with their audience, including their ability to create authentic connections, foster emotional attachment, and build trust through meaningful interactions. It also refers to the persuasiveness of the arguments included in the SMI’s post | |
| 11. Potential for quality presentation and empathy | Considers the SMI’s potential to effectively promote events and their ability to demonstrate empathy toward their audience, addressing their emotions appropriately | |
| 12. Success of past campaigns | Examines the SMI’s track record of successful past promotional campaigns, indicating their ability to generate positive results and drive desired outcomes | |
| 13. Assurance and quality communication | Focuses on the SMI’s proficiency in communicating the event with their followers, including their clarity of post details and ability to provide immediate feedback to inquiries | |
| Cost issues | 14. Payment and cost issues | Considers the financial aspect of collaborating with the SMI, including their fees and payment preference |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.