Table 4 Structural model assessment...

Table 4

Structural model assessment

Effect	Hypothesis and relationship	Std beta	Std error	t-value	p-value	BCCI 95%		VIF	f²	R²	Q²predict
Effect	Hypothesis and relationship	Std beta	Std error	t-value	p-value	LB	UB	VIF	f²	R²	Q²predict
Direct	H1: PPQ → PRS	0.755	0.038	19.644	0.000	0.683	0.809	1.000	1.325	0.570	0.567
	H2: PRS → GPI	0.208	0.070	2.979	0.001	0.097	0.327	2.376	0.038	0.520	0.481
	H3: PPQ → GPI	0.297	0.065	4.564	0.000	0.187	0.401	2.536	0.072
Indirect	H4: PPQ → PRS → GPI	0.157	0.053	2.942	0.003	0.061	0.268
Interaction	H5a: ENC × PRS → GPI	0.068	0.087	0.784	0.217	−0.075	0.208		0.003
Interaction	H5b: ENC × PPQ → GPI	−0.162	0.082	1.982	0.024	−0.299	−0.032		0.019

Effect	Hypothesis and relationship	Std beta	Std error	t-value	p-value	BCCI 95%		VIF	f²	R²	Q²predict
Effect	Hypothesis and relationship	Std beta	Std error	t-value	p-value	LB	UB	VIF	f²	R²	Q²predict
Direct	H1: PPQ → PRS	0.755	0.038	19.644	0.000	0.683	0.809	1.000	1.325	0.570	0.567
	H2: PRS → GPI	0.208	0.070	2.979	0.001	0.097	0.327	2.376	0.038	0.520	0.481
	H3: PPQ → GPI	0.297	0.065	4.564	0.000	0.187	0.401	2.536	0.072
Indirect	H4: PPQ → PRS → GPI	0.157	0.053	2.942	0.003	0.061	0.268
Interaction	H5a: ENC × PRS → GPI	0.068	0.087	0.784	0.217	−0.075	0.208		0.003
Interaction	H5b: ENC × PPQ → GPI	−0.162	0.082	1.982	0.024	−0.299	−0.032		0.019

Note(s): PPQ = Perceived green product quality; PRSs = Price sensitivity to green products; GPI = Green purchase intention; ENC = Environmental concern. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. BCCI = Bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval; LB = Lower Bound; UB = Upper Bound; VIF = Variance Inflation Factor; Effect size (f²): T = Trivial (<0.02), S = Small (0.02–0.15), M = Medium (0.15–0.35), L = Large (0.35 and above) Cohen (1988)

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]