Analytical framework of ESABR in the public sector
| A | Jurisdiction and organisational focus | No | % | B | Continent of research | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Central government | 9 | 6.6 | B1 | Africa | 4 | 2.9 |
| A2 | State/regional | 8 | 5.9 | B2 | America | 10 | 7.4 |
| A3 | Local government | 40 | 29.4 | B3 | Asia | 21 | 15.4 |
| A4 | State-owned enterprises | 16 | 11.8 | B4 | Australia | 24 | 17.6 |
| A5 | Universities | 37 | 27.2 | B5 | Europe | 51 | 37.5 |
| A6 | Healthcare organisations | 3 | 2.2 | B6 | International | 26 | 19.1 |
| A7 | Mixed | 23 | 16.9 | Totals | 136 | ||
| Totals | 136 |
| A | Jurisdiction and organisational focus | No | % | B | Continent of research | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Central government | 9 | 6.6 | B1 | Africa | 4 | 2.9 |
| A2 | State/regional | 8 | 5.9 | B2 | America | 10 | 7.4 |
| A3 | Local government | 40 | 29.4 | B3 | Asia | 21 | 15.4 |
| A4 | State-owned enterprises | 16 | 11.8 | B4 | Australia | 24 | 17.6 |
| A5 | Universities | 37 | 27.2 | B5 | Europe | 51 | 37.5 |
| A6 | Healthcare organisations | 3 | 2.2 | B6 | International | 26 | 19.1 |
| A7 | Mixed | 23 | 16.9 | ||||
| C | Focus of literature | No | % | D | Research methods | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Environmental budget | 0 | 0 | D1 | Quantitative empirical analysis | 31 | 22.8 |
| C2 | Environmental accounting | 8 | 5.88 | D2 | Survey/questionnaire/interviews/other empirical | 89 | 65.4 |
| C3 | Environmental reporting | 20 | 14.71 | D3 | Conceptual | 5 | 3.7 |
| C4 | Sustainability budget | 1 | 0.74 | D4 | Commentary/normative/policy | 6 | 4.4 |
| C5 | Sustainability accounting | 7 | 5.15 | D5 | Literature review | 5 | 3.7 |
| C6 | Sustainability reporting | 91 | 66.91 | Totals | 136 | ||
| C7 | Environmental and Sustainability management accounting | 4 | 2.94 | ||||
| C8 | Auditing and assurance | 5 | 3.68 | ||||
| Totals | 136 |
| C | Focus of literature | No | % | D | Research methods | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Environmental budget | 0 | 0 | D1 | Quantitative empirical analysis | 31 | 22.8 |
| C2 | Environmental accounting | 8 | 5.88 | D2 | Survey/questionnaire/interviews/other empirical | 89 | 65.4 |
| C3 | Environmental reporting | 20 | 14.71 | D3 | Conceptual | 5 | 3.7 |
| C4 | Sustainability budget | 1 | 0.74 | D4 | Commentary/normative/policy | 6 | 4.4 |
| C5 | Sustainability accounting | 7 | 5.15 | D5 | Literature review | 5 | 3.7 |
| C6 | Sustainability reporting | 91 | 66.91 | ||||
| C7 | Environmental and Sustainability management accounting | 4 | 2.94 | ||||
| C8 | Auditing and assurance | 5 | 3.68 | ||||
| E | Contribution and implications | No | % | F | Theoretical frameworks | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Theoretical/methodological implications | 44 | 32.4 | F1 | None proposed | 41 | 30.1 |
| E2 | Empirical/practical implications | 88 | 64.7 | F2 | Applies or considers previous | 92 | 67.6 |
| E3 | No implications | 4 | 2.9 | F3 | Proposes a new | 3 | 2.2 |
| Totals | 136 | Totals | 136 |
| E | Contribution and implications | No | % | F | Theoretical frameworks | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Theoretical/methodological implications | 44 | 32.4 | F1 | None proposed | 41 | 30.1 |
| E2 | Empirical/practical implications | 88 | 64.7 | F2 | Applies or considers previous | 92 | 67.6 |
| E3 | No implications | 4 | 2.9 | F3 | Proposes a new | 3 | 2.2 |
| G | Academics. Practitioners and consultants | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Academic(s) | 131 | 96.3 |
| G2 | Practitioners and consultants | 1 | 0.7 |
| G3 | Academic(s). Practitioners and consultants | 4 | 2.9 |
| Totals | 136 |
| G | Academics. Practitioners and consultants | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Academic(s) | 131 | 96.3 |
| G2 | Practitioners and consultants | 1 | 0.7 |
| G3 | Academic(s). Practitioners and consultants | 4 | 2.9 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.