Table A4. Findings of indirect effects...

Table A4.

Findings of indirect effects

Indirect paths	Standardized indirect effect	Boot SE	Bias Corrected CI, 95%	Relationship
Total effect (direct and indirect)
TLE → EI	1.103***	0.075	t: 4.613	<0.001
Indirect effect
H13a.TEL → ATTR → UT → EI	0.034***	0.065	[0.017, 0.029]	Supported
H13b.TEL → PV → UT → EI	0.037***	0.028	[0.004, 0.027]	Supported
H13c.TEL → PI → UT → EI	0.031***	0.049	[0.005, 0.018]	Supported
H13d.TEL → ATTR → EI	0.039***	0.030	[0.002, 0.010]	Supported
H13e.TEL → PV → EI	0.033***	0.032	[0.003, 0.026]	Supported
H13f.TEL → PI → EI	0.029***	0.041	[0.021, 0.019]	Supported
Direct effect
TLE → EI	0.092	0.463	[0.064, 0.052]	<0.554

Indirect paths	Standardized indirect effect	Boot SE	Bias Corrected CI, 95%	Relationship
Total effect (direct and indirect)
TLE → EI	1.103***	0.075	t: 4.613	<0.001
Indirect effect
H13a.TEL → ATTR → UT → EI	0.034***	0.065	[0.017, 0.029]	Supported
H13b.TEL → PV → UT → EI	0.037***	0.028	[0.004, 0.027]	Supported
H13c.TEL → PI → UT → EI	0.031***	0.049	[0.005, 0.018]	Supported
H13d.TEL → ATTR → EI	0.039***	0.030	[0.002, 0.010]	Supported
H13e.TEL → PV → EI	0.033***	0.032	[0.003, 0.026]	Supported
H13f.TEL → PI → EI	0.029***	0.041	[0.021, 0.019]	Supported
Direct effect
TLE → EI	0.092	0.463	[0.064, 0.052]	<0.554

Note(s):

The PROCESS path TLE → EI indicates the total effect, while the other TLE → EI reflects the direct effect Appendix 4. Both effects were non-significant, confirming that H5 is not supported in either the structural or mediation model. p < 0.553. p < 0.100, *p < 0.050, **p < 0.010, ***p < 0.001

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable