Table 4

Univariate analysis of how CEOs’ and board members’ personal characteristics affect the ESG performance of their firm

VariablesHigh score
(7<ESG <10)
n = 92,354
Low score
(4<ESG <6)
n = 28,030
p-value for difference
CEO_AGEit49.8950.32<0.001
CEO_EDUit2.351.72<0.001
CEO_INCOMEit11.2711.12<0.001
CEO_CONVit0.230.27<0.001
CEO_SINGLEit0.260.27<0.001
BOARD_CONVit0.190.22<0.001
BOARD_AGEit50.5650.370.014
BOARD_SINGLEit0.290.32<0.001
BOARD_EDUit2.311.75<0.001
BOARD_INCOMEit11.1410.95<0.001
CEO_MALEit0.820.88<0.001
BOARD_MALEit0.720.730.019
CEO_BUS_DEGit0.150.11<0.001
BOARD_BUS_DEGit0.160.12<0.001
SIZEit13.6113.81<0.001
EQUITYit0.500.46<0.001
ROAit0.130.09<0.001
Notes:

The table reports the mean values of the main variables of interest, which are grouped into high and low ESG scores. The binomial variables (CEO_CONVit, CEO_MALEit, CEO_BUS_DEGit and CEO_SINGLEit) were tested using a Chi-squared test. The other variables are tested using a T-test. All variables are defined in  Appendix 2

Source: Author’s own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal