Univariate analysis of how CEOs’ and board members’ personal characteristics affect the ESG performance of their firm
| Variables | High score (7<ESG <10) n = 92,354 | Low score (4<ESG <6) n = 28,030 | p-value for difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEO_AGEit | 49.89 | 50.32 | <0.001 |
| CEO_EDUit | 2.35 | 1.72 | <0.001 |
| CEO_INCOMEit | 11.27 | 11.12 | <0.001 |
| CEO_CONVit | 0.23 | 0.27 | <0.001 |
| CEO_SINGLEit | 0.26 | 0.27 | <0.001 |
| BOARD_CONVit | 0.19 | 0.22 | <0.001 |
| BOARD_AGEit | 50.56 | 50.37 | 0.014 |
| BOARD_SINGLEit | 0.29 | 0.32 | <0.001 |
| BOARD_EDUit | 2.31 | 1.75 | <0.001 |
| BOARD_INCOMEit | 11.14 | 10.95 | <0.001 |
| CEO_MALEit | 0.82 | 0.88 | <0.001 |
| BOARD_MALEit | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.019 |
| CEO_BUS_DEGit | 0.15 | 0.11 | <0.001 |
| BOARD_BUS_DEGit | 0.16 | 0.12 | <0.001 |
| SIZEit | 13.61 | 13.81 | <0.001 |
| EQUITYit | 0.50 | 0.46 | <0.001 |
| ROAit | 0.13 | 0.09 | <0.001 |
| Variables | High score | Low score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49.89 | 50.32 | <0.001 | |
| 2.35 | 1.72 | <0.001 | |
| 11.27 | 11.12 | <0.001 | |
| 0.23 | 0.27 | <0.001 | |
| 0.26 | 0.27 | <0.001 | |
| 0.19 | 0.22 | <0.001 | |
| 50.56 | 50.37 | 0.014 | |
| 0.29 | 0.32 | <0.001 | |
| 2.31 | 1.75 | <0.001 | |
| 11.14 | 10.95 | <0.001 | |
| 0.82 | 0.88 | <0.001 | |
| 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.019 | |
| 0.15 | 0.11 | <0.001 | |
| 0.16 | 0.12 | <0.001 | |
| 13.61 | 13.81 | <0.001 | |
| 0.50 | 0.46 | <0.001 | |
| 0.13 | 0.09 | <0.001 |
The table reports the mean values of the main variables of interest, which are grouped into high and low ESG scores. The binomial variables (CEO_CONVit, CEO_MALEit, CEO_BUS_DEGit and CEO_SINGLEit) were tested using a Chi-squared test. The other variables are tested using a T-test. All variables are defined in Appendix 2
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.