Comparison of students by gender and talent management program participation
| Variables | Female | Male | p-values1 | Talent management | No talent management | p-values1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEHAVIOR | 0.104 | 0.210 | 0.006*** | 0.22 | 0.147 | 0.105 |
| 0.188 | 0.348 | 0.008*** | 0.356 | 0.256 | 0.141 |
| 0.073 | 0.200 | 0.007*** | 0.203 | 0.128 | 0.159 |
| 0.052 | 0.081 | 0.388 | 0.102 | 0.058 | 0.258 |
| KNOWLEDGE | 0.340 | 0.364 | 0.413 | 0.386 | 0.344 | 0.232 |
| 0.352 | 0.369 | 0.600 | 0.449 | 0.331 | 0.009*** |
| 0.292 | 0.348 | 0.368 | 0.322 | 0.326 | 0.961 |
| 0.378 | 0.376 | 0.971 | 0.386 | 0.374 | 0.646 |
| ATTITUDE | 0.403 | 0.362 | 0.206 | 0.345 | 0.391 | 0.201 |
| Age | 22.260 | 22.763 | 0.060* | 22.305 | 22.640 | 0.115 |
| Sex (female = 1) | 0.288 | 0.459 | 0.022** | |||
| BACKGROUND | 0.497 | 0.605 | 0.008*** | 0.582 | 0.552 | 0.583 |
| INDEPENDENCE | 0.438 | 0.469 | 0.346 | 0.445 | 0.459 | 0.856 |
| Budget surplus | 6.664 | 3.3370 | 0.201 | 26.333 | 20.879 | 0.562 |
| ASPIRATION | 0.391 | 0.513 | 0.000*** | 0.517 | 0.443 | 0.012*** |
| PERFORMANCE | 3.859 | 3.896 | 0.555 | 4.093 | 3.808 | 0.009*** |
| Talent management program | 0.177 | 0.311 | 0.022** | |||
| Patience | 0.879 | 0.903 | 0.005*** | 0.908 | 0.888 | 0.046** |
| Risk-taking | 3.679 | 4.120 | 0.315 | 3.466 | 4.098 | 0.400 |
| No present bias | 0.981 | 0.950 | 0.047** | 0.979 | 0.958 | 0.881 |
| Variables | Female | Male | Talent management | No talent management | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEHAVIOR | 0.22 | 0.147 | 0.105 | |||
Behavior: loan | 0.356 | 0.256 | 0.141 | |||
Behavior: loan + savings | 0.203 | 0.128 | 0.159 | |||
Behavior: loan + arbitrage | 0.052 | 0.081 | 0.388 | 0.102 | 0.058 | 0.258 |
| KNOWLEDGE | 0.340 | 0.364 | 0.413 | 0.386 | 0.344 | 0.232 |
Knowledge: loan | 0.352 | 0.369 | 0.600 | |||
Knowledge: savings | 0.292 | 0.348 | 0.368 | 0.322 | 0.326 | 0.961 |
Knowledge: arbitrage | 0.378 | 0.376 | 0.971 | 0.386 | 0.374 | 0.646 |
| ATTITUDE | 0.403 | 0.362 | 0.206 | 0.345 | 0.391 | 0.201 |
| Age | 22.305 | 22.640 | 0.115 | |||
| Sex (female = 1) | ||||||
| BACKGROUND | 0.582 | 0.552 | 0.583 | |||
| INDEPENDENCE | 0.438 | 0.469 | 0.346 | 0.445 | 0.459 | 0.856 |
| Budget surplus | 6.664 | 3.3370 | 0.201 | 26.333 | 20.879 | 0.562 |
| ASPIRATION | ||||||
| PERFORMANCE | 3.859 | 3.896 | 0.555 | |||
| Talent management program | ||||||
| Patience | ||||||
| Risk-taking | 3.679 | 4.120 | 0.315 | 3.466 | 4.098 | 0.400 |
| No present bias | 0.979 | 0.958 | 0.881 |
Note(s): 1Mann-Whitney U-test, N = 231, ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1
The table presents mean values by gender and talent management program participation, along with p-values indicating the significance of differences. Composite variables are in capital letters, and italic values denote statistically significant differences
Source(s): Authors’ own work