Table 1

Comparison of students by gender and talent management program participation

VariablesFemaleMalep-values1Talent managementNo talent managementp-values1
BEHAVIOR0.1040.2100.006***0.220.1470.105
  1. Behavior: loan

0.1880.3480.008***0.3560.2560.141
  1. Behavior: loan + savings

0.0730.2000.007***0.2030.1280.159
  1. Behavior: loan + arbitrage

0.0520.0810.3880.1020.0580.258
KNOWLEDGE0.3400.3640.4130.3860.3440.232
  1. Knowledge: loan

0.3520.3690.6000.4490.3310.009***
  1. Knowledge: savings

0.2920.3480.3680.3220.3260.961
  1. Knowledge: arbitrage

0.3780.3760.9710.3860.3740.646
ATTITUDE0.4030.3620.2060.3450.3910.201
Age22.26022.7630.060*22.30522.6400.115
Sex (female = 1)   0.2880.4590.022**
BACKGROUND0.4970.6050.008***0.5820.5520.583
INDEPENDENCE0.4380.4690.3460.4450.4590.856
Budget surplus6.6643.33700.20126.33320.8790.562
ASPIRATION0.3910.5130.000***0.5170.4430.012***
PERFORMANCE3.8593.8960.5554.0933.8080.009***
Talent management program0.1770.3110.022**   
Patience0.8790.9030.005***0.9080.8880.046**
Risk-taking3.6794.1200.3153.4664.0980.400
No present bias0.9810.9500.047**0.9790.9580.881

Note(s): 1Mann-Whitney U-test, N = 231, ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1

The table presents mean values by gender and talent management program participation, along with p-values indicating the significance of differences. Composite variables are in capital letters, and italic values denote statistically significant differences

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal